How Nehru defied the U.S. and used force against the Portuguese | World Defense

How Nehru defied the U.S. and used force against the Portuguese

jbgt90

MEMBER
Joined
Nov 26, 2017
Messages
154
Reactions
242 23
Country
India
Location
India
http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/the-liberation-of-goa/article22339624.ece

While Jawaharlal Nehru advised the U.S., the then Soviet Union, and other big powers to abjure force and work towards disarmament, he was himself faced with a dilemma in 1961: whether or not to use force to liberate Goa. It was an agonising decision for a person who adopted the Gandhian approach in international affairs.

After Britain and France left India, it was expected that Portugal would leave too. But Portugal refused. Emphasising that it had been in Goa for centuries, Portugal said that the Goan Catholics would not be safe if it left. Portugal conveniently overlooked the fact over 60% of Goans were Hindus, and many Goan Christians, like the editor Frank Moraes, had a place of honour in Indian public life. Compared to only two lakh Catholics in Goa, there were five million Catholics living peacefully in secular India. Geography, language and nationality bound the people of India with the people of Goa. It was natural that Goa, which had seen a long indigenous freedom movement, should be a part of India.

In the rest of India, people began demanding that Goa be liberated forcibly. In 1955, a satyagraha was launched by the communist and socialist parties for the freedom of Goa. When the satyagrahis entered Goa, the Portuguese opened fire, killing 20 Indians. Nehru imposed an economic blockade, but was not prepared to go further. He hoped that the popular movement in Goa and the pressure of world public opinion would force the hands of the Goan authorities.

It was in 1957, in a letter to Vinoba Bhave, that Nehru first hinted at the possibility of military action. The Goan question came alive when Portugal paid no heed to a UN resolution of December 1960 asking it to indicate when it would grant independence to its colonies in Asia and Africa. In December 1961, Portuguese soldiers in Goa fired at villagers.

Finding that his policy of patience and adherence to international ethics had not yielded results, Nehru decided to free Goa by force. Though advised by American President John F. Kennedy, British Prime Minister Harold Macmillan and UN Secretary-General U Thant to postpone action, Nehru made up his mind. On December 18, after a long-drawn fight against Indian troops, the Portuguese gave up resistance. The Governor General of Goa, Vassalo e Silva, signed a document of unconditional surrender.

The Western media assailed the action as a display of “Indian hypocrisy”, which represented a breach of international law by a nation that professed non-violence. Though the liberation of Goa by force raised the prestige of the government in India, it adversely affected Nehru’s international image, but only briefly. Kennedy told B.K. Nehru, India’s ambassador to the U.S., that after taking military action in Goa, Nehru may not be able to talk of non-violence as he did before. But Kennedy came to India’s rescue in India’s 1962 conflict with China.

Praveen Davar is a former Army officer, former member of the National Commission for Minorities, and a political analyst
 

jbgt90

MEMBER
Joined
Nov 26, 2017
Messages
154
Reactions
242 23
Country
India
Location
India
Came across this article , though this i believe gives an insight as to why the western powers stopped selling us weapons , after 62 we went to the British and even the Americans as we were upgrading and expanding our armed services , but were not given them . That pushed us solely into the Soviet camp as far as purchases of systems go . I believe the western powers thought this would teach us a lesson and would be able to force us to depend on them for our security , i doubt any one in the Us administration thought we would go with the soviets.
 

Joe Shearer

MEMBER
Joined
Nov 25, 2017
Messages
659
Reactions
956 70
Country
India
Location
India
Came across this article , though this i believe gives an insight as to why the western powers stopped selling us weapons , after 62 we went to the British and even the Americans as we were upgrading and expanding our armed services , but were not given them . That pushed us solely into the Soviet camp as far as purchases of systems go . I believe the western powers thought this would teach us a lesson and would be able to force us to depend on them for our security , i doubt any one in the Us administration thought we would go with the soviets.
Very classy reproduction, thank_you_very_much, champ. However, on the other hand, we have Galbraith's copious references to the imports of small arms, ammunition and necessities of warfare that had simply been not done, by yet another Mallu disaster as RM. It wasn't as stark black and white as your subsequent comment makes it. You have encapsulated nearly a year's up and down discussion on this. Someone like you obviously has both Galbraith and B. K. Nehru on your shelves. I wish you would present the counter-point.
 

jbgt90

MEMBER
Joined
Nov 26, 2017
Messages
154
Reactions
242 23
Country
India
Location
India
Very classy reproduction, thank_you_very_much, champ. However, on the other hand, we have Galbraith's copious references to the imports of small arms, ammunition and necessities of warfare that had simply been not done, by yet another Mallu disaster as RM. It wasn't as stark black and white as your subsequent comment makes it. You have encapsulated nearly a year's up and down discussion on this. Someone like you obviously has both Galbraith and B. K. Nehru on your shelves. I wish you would present the counter-point.
Yes young man i do know about it , but you seem hell bent on getting me to type three paragraphs when i can sum it up in two lines :lol:
will do so on a later date.
 

Joe Shearer

MEMBER
Joined
Nov 25, 2017
Messages
659
Reactions
956 70
Country
India
Location
India
Yes young man i do know about it , but you seem hell bent on getting me to type three paragraphs when i can sum it up in two lines :lol:
will do so on a later date.
:D

Precisely!

In Plum's words, tell us all, sparing no detail, no matter how insignificant it might seem.
 

vsdoc

BANNED
Joined
Nov 28, 2017
Messages
74
Reactions
38 1
Country
India
Location
India
You two are certified nerds.

Cheers, Doc
 

jbgt90

MEMBER
Joined
Nov 26, 2017
Messages
154
Reactions
242 23
Country
India
Location
India

jbgt90

MEMBER
Joined
Nov 26, 2017
Messages
154
Reactions
242 23
Country
India
Location
India
Are you serious?
Do you mean if i have 25k books ? then Yes i do and yes i have read them all !!!
Been collecting since i was very young , have three rooms with my books as of now.
 

Khafee

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
11,131
Reactions
111 21,082 1,066
Country
Saudi Arabia
Location
Saudi Arabia
Do you mean if i have 25k books ? then Yes i do and yes i have read them all !!!
Been collecting since i was very young , have three rooms with my books as of now.
Ever thought of putting them online?
 

jbgt90

MEMBER
Joined
Nov 26, 2017
Messages
154
Reactions
242 23
Country
India
Location
India
Ever thought of putting them online?
Why ? most people today hate reading , most books are already available on kindle. till a few years ago I used to lend my books to those who came over , only to have them never returned . Now a days i only buy books for my self and hopefully my kids will read them someday .
 

Khafee

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
11,131
Reactions
111 21,082 1,066
Country
Saudi Arabia
Location
Saudi Arabia
Why ? most people today hate reading , most books are already available on kindle. till a few years ago I used to lend my books to those who came over , only to have them never returned . Now a days i only buy books for my self and hopefully my kids will read them someday .
Yes, that is usually what people do when they borrow books.
 

Joe Shearer

MEMBER
Joined
Nov 25, 2017
Messages
659
Reactions
956 70
Country
India
Location
India
Why ? most people today hate reading , most books are already available on kindle. till a few years ago I used to lend my books to those who came over , only to have them never returned . Now a days i only buy books for my self and hopefully my kids will read them someday .
<sigh....>

"....it is to be hoped...."
 

jbgt90

MEMBER
Joined
Nov 26, 2017
Messages
154
Reactions
242 23
Country
India
Location
India
Yes, that is usually what people do when they borrow books.
Yes but for a guy like me books mean a lot , so any loss is felt. I dont know may be i am too old fashioned to think that if you borrow something you should return it .
 
Top