Crisis in the Arabian Gulf | Page 17 | World Defense

Khafee

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
12,324
Reactions
24,463 1,293 0
Media: Israel and the United States will put up with Assad if Putin ‘surrenders’ Iran

Tuesday, June 4, 2019


The US President’s advisor on national security John Bolton, head of the Israeli National Security Council Meir Ben-Shabbat and his Russian counterpart Nikolai Patrushev will hold a meeting in Jerusalem in late June.

According to the Saudi newspaper Asharq Al-Awsat, one of the main topics discussed at the meeting will be Iran’s military presence in Syria.

According to the article, Israel and the United States intend to offer Russia a deal in which Washington and Jerusalem will recognize the legitimacy of the Assad regime and subsequently abolish all restrictive measures imposed on Damascus in exchange for Moscow participating in joint actions to contain Tehran.

As the newspaper notes, “the agenda of the meeting is based on” the mutual understanding reached between the two presidents, Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, on the importance of ensuring Israel’s security and supporting Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. “



 

Khafee

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
12,324
Reactions
24,463 1,293 0
U.S. commander says Iran threat very real, imminent
07 June 2019
By Nicholas Sakelaris


7667

U.S. forces watch the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln from the hangar bay of the Wasp-class amphibious assault ship USS Kearsarge on May 17.
Photo by MC Nicholas R. Boris/U.S. Navy/UPI | License Photo


June 7 (UPI) -- The top commander of U.S. forces in the Middle East says the Iranian regime poses an "imminent threat" and could carry out an attack basically at any time.

U.S. Marine Corps Gen. Frank McKenzie told NBC News Thursday Iranian proxies are part of the threat.

"I think the threat is imminent," he said. "We continually evaluate our force posture in the region."

The USS Lincoln aircraft carrier strike group and a fleet of Air Force bombers have been in the Middle East along with anti-missile missiles and a Marine expeditionary force to deter Iranian action and guard U.S. allies. F/A-18E Super Hornets and E-2D Advanced Hawkeyes from the Lincoln and Air Force B-52H Stratofortress aircraft conducted joint exercises in the Arabian Sea this week.

"I don't actually believe the threat has diminished ... I believe the threat is very real," said McKenzie, who met recently with the Iraqi prime minister and defense chief. He declined to go into detail on the threats Iran poses.

McKenzie also said the increased presence forced Tehran to back off a planned attack against U.S. forces in the Persian Gulf region.
"They probe for weaknesses all the time," McKenzie said. "I would say the threat has probably evolved in certain ways even as our defensive posture has changed and become more aggressive, and we certainly thank our Iraqi partners for many of the things they've done."

Friday, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Abbas Mousavi warned French President Emmanuel Macron that the 2015 nuclear deal may be beyond saving. His remarks were a response to Macron's call for new negotiations to save the deal, which the United States abandoned last year.

Macron and President Donald Trump met publicly Thursday to discuss the threat from Iran. Though France remains in the pact, Macron listed four common priorities the United States and France share regarding Iran's behavior -- preventing Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, reducing Iran's ballistic activity, containing Iran's regional activity and establishing peace in the region.
"I think we do share the same objective on Iran," Macron said.

Mousavi said the remarks by Macron deepens distrust among the countries still in the agreement.
"The Europeans have failed to prepare the grounds for Iran to fully benefit from the multilateral agreement," Mousavi said.

France, Germany and Britain have used a trade deal called INSTEX that allows them to continue doing business with Iran and circumvent U.S. sanctions. The three countries haven't been able to actually put that trade deal to work and instead continue tinkering with it.

Iran stopped honoring some of its commitments under the JCPOA in retaliation for the U.S. oil sanctions. In May, Iran surpassed the cap on enriched uranium and heavy water production.

On Thursday, Trump said U.S. sanctions have crippled Iran's economy.
"They're doing very poorly as a nation," Trump said. "They're failing as a nation. And I don't want them to fail as a nation. We can turn that around very quickly, but the sanctions have been extraordinary how powerful they've been, and other things. I understand they want to talk and if they want to talk that's fine."

 

Khafee

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
12,324
Reactions
24,463 1,293 0
U.S. commander says Iran threat very real, imminent
07 June 2019
By Nicholas Sakelaris


View attachment 7667
U.S. forces watch the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln from the hangar bay of the Wasp-class amphibious assault ship USS Kearsarge on May 17.
Photo by MC Nicholas R. Boris/U.S. Navy/UPI | License Photo


June 7 (UPI) -- The top commander of U.S. forces in the Middle East says the Iranian regime poses an "imminent threat" and could carry out an attack basically at any time.

U.S. Marine Corps Gen. Frank McKenzie told NBC News Thursday Iranian proxies are part of the threat.

"I think the threat is imminent," he said. "We continually evaluate our force posture in the region."

The USS Lincoln aircraft carrier strike group and a fleet of Air Force bombers have been in the Middle East along with anti-missile missiles and a Marine expeditionary force to deter Iranian action and guard U.S. allies. F/A-18E Super Hornets and E-2D Advanced Hawkeyes from the Lincoln and Air Force B-52H Stratofortress aircraft conducted joint exercises in the Arabian Sea this week.

"I don't actually believe the threat has diminished ... I believe the threat is very real," said McKenzie, who met recently with the Iraqi prime minister and defense chief. He declined to go into detail on the threats Iran poses.

McKenzie also said the increased presence forced Tehran to back off a planned attack against U.S. forces in the Persian Gulf region.
"They probe for weaknesses all the time," McKenzie said. "I would say the threat has probably evolved in certain ways even as our defensive posture has changed and become more aggressive, and we certainly thank our Iraqi partners for many of the things they've done."

Friday, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Abbas Mousavi warned French President Emmanuel Macron that the 2015 nuclear deal may be beyond saving. His remarks were a response to Macron's call for new negotiations to save the deal, which the United States abandoned last year.

Macron and President Donald Trump met publicly Thursday to discuss the threat from Iran. Though France remains in the pact, Macron listed four common priorities the United States and France share regarding Iran's behavior -- preventing Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, reducing Iran's ballistic activity, containing Iran's regional activity and establishing peace in the region.
"I think we do share the same objective on Iran," Macron said.

Mousavi said the remarks by Macron deepens distrust among the countries still in the agreement.
"The Europeans have failed to prepare the grounds for Iran to fully benefit from the multilateral agreement," Mousavi said.

France, Germany and Britain have used a trade deal called INSTEX that allows them to continue doing business with Iran and circumvent U.S. sanctions. The three countries haven't been able to actually put that trade deal to work and instead continue tinkering with it.

Iran stopped honoring some of its commitments under the JCPOA in retaliation for the U.S. oil sanctions. In May, Iran surpassed the cap on enriched uranium and heavy water production.

On Thursday, Trump said U.S. sanctions have crippled Iran's economy.
"They're doing very poorly as a nation," Trump said. "They're failing as a nation. And I don't want them to fail as a nation. We can turn that around very quickly, but the sanctions have been extraordinary how powerful they've been, and other things. I understand they want to talk and if they want to talk that's fine."

 

Khafee

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
12,324
Reactions
24,463 1,293 0
UAE, Norway, Saudi Arabia brief UN Security Council on sabotage of ships off Fujairah
08 June 2019

7673

The attacks took place within UAE territorial waters less than 12 nautical miles from the UAE coastline.

The Permanent Representatives to the United Nations of the United Arab Emirates, the Kingdom of Norway, and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia on Thursday briefed members of the United Nations Security Council on the preliminary findings of the investigation into the coordinated attacks on four oil tankers that took place on the morning of 12th May 2019 off the port of Fujairah.

The attacks took place within UAE territorial waters less than 12 nautical miles from the UAE coastline, and UAE authorities have taken the lead in the investigation in coordination with several international partners.

The affected states stressed that the attacks endangered international commercial navigation and the security of global energy supplies, and threatened international peace and security. They also thanked Council members who had already rendered support to the investigation into the attacks and invited all members of the Council to review the evidence that has been secured by UAE authorities.

Furthermore, the UAE, Norway, and Saudi Arabia committed to keeping Council members apprised of further findings from the ongoing investigation and requested that the Security Council be seized of the matter.

The assessment of the damage to the four vessels and the chemical analysis of the debris recovered revealed it was highly likely that limpet mines were used in the attacks on the four vessels on 12th May 2019, the statement revealed.

"Based on the evaluation of radar data, and the short time several of the targeted vessels had been at anchor prior to the attacks, it appears most likely that the mines were placed on the vessels by divers deployed from fast boats," it added.

While investigations are still ongoing, the joint statement said that "these facts are strong indications that the four attacks were part of a sophisticated and coordinated operation carried out by an actor with significant operational capacity, most likely a state actor."

It went on to note that the above is supported by the following facts:
- The attacks required intelligence capabilities for the deliberate selection of four oil tankers from among almost 200 vessels of all types that lay at anchor off Fujairah at the time of the attacks. One of the targets was at the opposite end of the anchorage area from the other ships, which indicates that these were premeditated strikes,
rather than targets picked at random.

- The attacks likely required the positive identification of these pre-selected targets by the operatives carrying out the attacks.

- The attacks required trained divers; the explosive charges were placed with a high degree of precision under the waterline, in ways that were designed to incapacitate the ships without sinking them or detonating their cargoes - indicating minute knowledge of the design of the targeted ships.

- The attacks required a high degree of coordination among what most likely were several teams of operatives. This included the timed detonation of all four explosive charges, sequenced within less than an hour.

- The attacks required the expert navigation of fast boats, with understanding of the geographic area, that were able to intrude into UAE territorial waters and to exfiltrate the operatives after delivering the explosive charges.

The UAE, Norway, and Saudi Arabia will also share these preliminary findings with the London-based International Maritime Organisation, IMO. The UAE will also inform the organisation and its members of protective measures for the safety and security of maritime shipping.

 

Khafee

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
12,324
Reactions
24,463 1,293 0
UAE, Norway, Saudi Arabia brief UN Security Council on sabotage of ships off Fujairah
08 June 2019

View attachment 7673
The attacks took place within UAE territorial waters less than 12 nautical miles from the UAE coastline.

The Permanent Representatives to the United Nations of the United Arab Emirates, the Kingdom of Norway, and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia on Thursday briefed members of the United Nations Security Council on the preliminary findings of the investigation into the coordinated attacks on four oil tankers that took place on the morning of 12th May 2019 off the port of Fujairah.

The attacks took place within UAE territorial waters less than 12 nautical miles from the UAE coastline, and UAE authorities have taken the lead in the investigation in coordination with several international partners.

The affected states stressed that the attacks endangered international commercial navigation and the security of global energy supplies, and threatened international peace and security. They also thanked Council members who had already rendered support to the investigation into the attacks and invited all members of the Council to review the evidence that has been secured by UAE authorities.

Furthermore, the UAE, Norway, and Saudi Arabia committed to keeping Council members apprised of further findings from the ongoing investigation and requested that the Security Council be seized of the matter.

The assessment of the damage to the four vessels and the chemical analysis of the debris recovered revealed it was highly likely that limpet mines were used in the attacks on the four vessels on 12th May 2019, the statement revealed.

"Based on the evaluation of radar data, and the short time several of the targeted vessels had been at anchor prior to the attacks, it appears most likely that the mines were placed on the vessels by divers deployed from fast boats," it added.

While investigations are still ongoing, the joint statement said that "these facts are strong indications that the four attacks were part of a sophisticated and coordinated operation carried out by an actor with significant operational capacity, most likely a state actor."

It went on to note that the above is supported by the following facts:
- The attacks required intelligence capabilities for the deliberate selection of four oil tankers from among almost 200 vessels of all types that lay at anchor off Fujairah at the time of the attacks. One of the targets was at the opposite end of the anchorage area from the other ships, which indicates that these were premeditated strikes,
rather than targets picked at random.

- The attacks likely required the positive identification of these pre-selected targets by the operatives carrying out the attacks.

- The attacks required trained divers; the explosive charges were placed with a high degree of precision under the waterline, in ways that were designed to incapacitate the ships without sinking them or detonating their cargoes - indicating minute knowledge of the design of the targeted ships.

- The attacks required a high degree of coordination among what most likely were several teams of operatives. This included the timed detonation of all four explosive charges, sequenced within less than an hour.

- The attacks required the expert navigation of fast boats, with understanding of the geographic area, that were able to intrude into UAE territorial waters and to exfiltrate the operatives after delivering the explosive charges.

The UAE, Norway, and Saudi Arabia will also share these preliminary findings with the London-based International Maritime Organisation, IMO. The UAE will also inform the organisation and its members of protective measures for the safety and security of maritime shipping.

 

Khafee

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
12,324
Reactions
24,463 1,293 0
US carrier in Persian Gulf region sends clear signal to Iran
By ROBERT BURNS
08 June 2019
an hour ago


Marine Gen. Frank McKenzie, head of U.S. Central Command, confers with an Air Force officer below the bomb bay of a B-52 bomber on Friday, June 7, 2019 at al-Udeid air base in Qatar. McKenzie said on Friday that he thinks Iran had been planning some sort of attack on shipping or U.S. forces in Iraq. Two other officials, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive details, said Iran was at a high state of readiness in early May with its ships, submarines, surface-to-air missiles and drone aircraft. “It is my assessment that if we had not reenforced, it is entirely likely that an attack would have taken place by now,” he said. (AP Photo/Robert Burns)

United States Navy fighter jets were flying missions from an aircraft carrier in the Arabian Sea on Saturday, a signal to Iran of America's global military reach. (June 8)

ABOARD THE USS ABRAHAM LINCOLN (AP) — Under a starry sky, U.S. Navy fighter jets catapulted off the aircraft carrier’s deck and flew north over the darkened waters of the northern Arabian Sea, a unmistaken signal to Iran that the foremost symbol of the American military’s global reach is back in its neighborhood, perhaps to stay.

The USS Abraham Lincoln , with its contingent of Navy destroyers and cruisers and a fighting force of about 70 aircraft, is the centerpiece of the Pentagon’s response to
what it calls Iranian threats to attack U.S. forces or commercial shipping in the Persian Gulf region. In recent years, there has been no regular U.S. aircraft carrier presence in the Middle East.

U.S. officials have said that signs of heightened Iranian preparations to strike U.S. and other targets in the waters off Iran as well as in Iraq and Yemen in late April emerged shortly after the Trump administration announced it was clamping down further on Iran’s economy by ending waivers to sanctions on buyers of Iranian crude oil.
The administration went a step beyond that on Friday, announcing penalties that target Iran’s largest petrochemical company.

On Saturday the Lincoln was steaming in international waters east of Oman and about 200 miles from Iran’s southern coastline. One month after its arrival in the region, the Lincoln has not entered the Persian Gulf, and it’s not apparent that it will. The USS Gonzalez, a destroyer that is part of the Lincoln strike group, is operating in the Gulf.

Rear Adm. John F. G. Wade, commander of the Lincoln strike group, said Iran’s naval forces have adhered to international standards of interaction with ships in his group.
“Since we’ve been operating in the region, we’ve had several interactions with Iranians,” he said. “To this point all have been safe and professional — meaning, the Iranians have done nothing to impede our maneuverability or acted in a way which required us to take defensive measures.”

The Lincoln’s contingent of 44 Navy F-18 Super Hornets are flying a carefully calibrated set of missions off the carrier night and day, mainly to establish a visible U.S. “presence” that Marine Gen. Frank McKenzie, the head of Central Command, said Saturday seems to have caused Iran to “tinker with” its preparation for potential attacks.

He said on Friday that he thinks Iran had been planning some sort of attack on shipping or U.S. forces in Iraq. Two other officials, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive details, said Iran was at a high state of readiness in early May with its ships, submarines, surface-to-air missiles and drone aircraft.

“It is my assessment that if we had not reinforced, it is entirely likely that an attack would have taken place by now,” McKenzie said.
In an interview on the bridge, or command station, of the Lincoln with reporters who are traveling with him throughout the Gulf region, McKenzie said the carrier has made an important difference.

“We believe they are recalculating. They have to take this into account as they think about various actions that they might take. So we think this is having a very god stabilizing effect,” he said.

“They are looking hard at the carrier because they know we are looking hard at them,” McKenzie said.

He said earlier in the week that he had not ruled out requesting additional defensive forces to bolster the deterrence of Iran, whose economy is being squeezed hard by U.S. sanctions after President Donald Trump pulled the U.S. last year from the 2015 nuclear deal between Tehran and world powers. The U.S. already has announced plans to send 900 additional troops to the Mideast and extend the stay of 600 more as tens of thousands of others also are on the ground across the region.

Iran’s influential Revolutionary Guard has said it doesn’t fear a possible war with the U.S. and asserted that America’s military might has not grown in power in recent years. “The enemy is not more powerful than before,” the Guard spokesman, Gen. Ramazan Sharif, said in late May.

The U.S. has accused Iran of being behind a string of recent incidents, including what officials allege was sabotage of oil tankers off the coast of the United Arab Emirates.

McKenzie spent two days aboard the Lincoln to confer with naval commanders, observe both daytime and nighttime flight operations, and to thank crew members. Their deployment plans were disrupted when the White House approved McKenzie’s request in early May that the Lincoln cut short its time in the Mediterranean Sea and sail swiftly to the Arabian Sea.

“I am the reason you are here,” the general said in an all-hands announcement to the nearly 6,000 personnel on the Lincoln Friday night shortly after he flew aboard by Navy helicopter from Oman.

“I requested this ship because of ongoing tensions with Iran,” he said. “And nothing says you’re interested in somebody like 90,000 tons of aircraft carrier and everything that comes with it. Our intent by bringing you here was to stabilize the situation and let Iran know that now is not the time to do something goofy.”

McKenzie also requested, and received, four Air Force long-range B-52 bombers. They were in the region 51 hours after being summoned and were flying missions three days later. They are now operating from al-Udeid air base in Qatar. There had been no U.S. bomber presence in the Gulf region since late February.

In an interview Friday after speaking with B-52 pilots at al-Udeid, McKenzie said it’s hard to know whether that gap in a bomber presence had emboldened the Iranians.
“Cumulatively, the fact that we had drawn down in (the Mideast) may have had an effect on Iranian behavior,” he said. “We do know that bringing stuff back in seems to have had an effect on their behavior,” noting that there have been no Iranian attacks on U.S. forces.

On Saturday aboard the Lincoln, McKenzie was asked whether there have been any incidents between Iranian and American naval force in recent weeks.
“No, actually I think things are pretty quiet right now,” he said.

U.S. officials have said that signs of heightened Iranian preparations to strike U.S. and other targets in the waters off Iran as well as in Iraq and Yemen in late April emerged shortly after the Trump administration announced it was clamping down further on Iran’s economy by ending waivers to sanctions on buyers of Iranian crude oil.

The administration went a step beyond that on Friday, announcing penalties that target Iran’s largest petrochemical company.

 

Khafee

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
12,324
Reactions
24,463 1,293 0
US carrier in Persian Gulf region sends clear signal to Iran
By ROBERT BURNS
08 June 2019
an hour ago


Marine Gen. Frank McKenzie, head of U.S. Central Command, confers with an Air Force officer below the bomb bay of a B-52 bomber on Friday, June 7, 2019 at al-Udeid air base in Qatar. McKenzie said on Friday that he thinks Iran had been planning some sort of attack on shipping or U.S. forces in Iraq. Two other officials, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive details, said Iran was at a high state of readiness in early May with its ships, submarines, surface-to-air missiles and drone aircraft. “It is my assessment that if we had not reenforced, it is entirely likely that an attack would have taken place by now,” he said. (AP Photo/Robert Burns)

United States Navy fighter jets were flying missions from an aircraft carrier in the Arabian Sea on Saturday, a signal to Iran of America's global military reach. (June 8)

ABOARD THE USS ABRAHAM LINCOLN (AP) — Under a starry sky, U.S. Navy fighter jets catapulted off the aircraft carrier’s deck and flew north over the darkened waters of the northern Arabian Sea, a unmistaken signal to Iran that the foremost symbol of the American military’s global reach is back in its neighborhood, perhaps to stay.

The USS Abraham Lincoln , with its contingent of Navy destroyers and cruisers and a fighting force of about 70 aircraft, is the centerpiece of the Pentagon’s response to
what it calls Iranian threats to attack U.S. forces or commercial shipping in the Persian Gulf region. In recent years, there has been no regular U.S. aircraft carrier presence in the Middle East.

U.S. officials have said that signs of heightened Iranian preparations to strike U.S. and other targets in the waters off Iran as well as in Iraq and Yemen in late April emerged shortly after the Trump administration announced it was clamping down further on Iran’s economy by ending waivers to sanctions on buyers of Iranian crude oil.
The administration went a step beyond that on Friday, announcing penalties that target Iran’s largest petrochemical company.

On Saturday the Lincoln was steaming in international waters east of Oman and about 200 miles from Iran’s southern coastline. One month after its arrival in the region, the Lincoln has not entered the Persian Gulf, and it’s not apparent that it will. The USS Gonzalez, a destroyer that is part of the Lincoln strike group, is operating in the Gulf.

Rear Adm. John F. G. Wade, commander of the Lincoln strike group, said Iran’s naval forces have adhered to international standards of interaction with ships in his group.
“Since we’ve been operating in the region, we’ve had several interactions with Iranians,” he said. “To this point all have been safe and professional — meaning, the Iranians have done nothing to impede our maneuverability or acted in a way which required us to take defensive measures.”

The Lincoln’s contingent of 44 Navy F-18 Super Hornets are flying a carefully calibrated set of missions off the carrier night and day, mainly to establish a visible U.S. “presence” that Marine Gen. Frank McKenzie, the head of Central Command, said Saturday seems to have caused Iran to “tinker with” its preparation for potential attacks.

He said on Friday that he thinks Iran had been planning some sort of attack on shipping or U.S. forces in Iraq. Two other officials, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive details, said Iran was at a high state of readiness in early May with its ships, submarines, surface-to-air missiles and drone aircraft.

“It is my assessment that if we had not reinforced, it is entirely likely that an attack would have taken place by now,” McKenzie said.
In an interview on the bridge, or command station, of the Lincoln with reporters who are traveling with him throughout the Gulf region, McKenzie said the carrier has made an important difference.

“We believe they are recalculating. They have to take this into account as they think about various actions that they might take. So we think this is having a very god stabilizing effect,” he said.

“They are looking hard at the carrier because they know we are looking hard at them,” McKenzie said.

He said earlier in the week that he had not ruled out requesting additional defensive forces to bolster the deterrence of Iran, whose economy is being squeezed hard by U.S. sanctions after President Donald Trump pulled the U.S. last year from the 2015 nuclear deal between Tehran and world powers. The U.S. already has announced plans to send 900 additional troops to the Mideast and extend the stay of 600 more as tens of thousands of others also are on the ground across the region.

Iran’s influential Revolutionary Guard has said it doesn’t fear a possible war with the U.S. and asserted that America’s military might has not grown in power in recent years. “The enemy is not more powerful than before,” the Guard spokesman, Gen. Ramazan Sharif, said in late May.

The U.S. has accused Iran of being behind a string of recent incidents, including what officials allege was sabotage of oil tankers off the coast of the United Arab Emirates.

McKenzie spent two days aboard the Lincoln to confer with naval commanders, observe both daytime and nighttime flight operations, and to thank crew members. Their deployment plans were disrupted when the White House approved McKenzie’s request in early May that the Lincoln cut short its time in the Mediterranean Sea and sail swiftly to the Arabian Sea.

“I am the reason you are here,” the general said in an all-hands announcement to the nearly 6,000 personnel on the Lincoln Friday night shortly after he flew aboard by Navy helicopter from Oman.

“I requested this ship because of ongoing tensions with Iran,” he said. “And nothing says you’re interested in somebody like 90,000 tons of aircraft carrier and everything that comes with it. Our intent by bringing you here was to stabilize the situation and let Iran know that now is not the time to do something goofy.”

McKenzie also requested, and received, four Air Force long-range B-52 bombers. They were in the region 51 hours after being summoned and were flying missions three days later. They are now operating from al-Udeid air base in Qatar. There had been no U.S. bomber presence in the Gulf region since late February.

In an interview Friday after speaking with B-52 pilots at al-Udeid, McKenzie said it’s hard to know whether that gap in a bomber presence had emboldened the Iranians.
“Cumulatively, the fact that we had drawn down in (the Mideast) may have had an effect on Iranian behavior,” he said. “We do know that bringing stuff back in seems to have had an effect on their behavior,” noting that there have been no Iranian attacks on U.S. forces.

On Saturday aboard the Lincoln, McKenzie was asked whether there have been any incidents between Iranian and American naval force in recent weeks.
“No, actually I think things are pretty quiet right now,” he said.

U.S. officials have said that signs of heightened Iranian preparations to strike U.S. and other targets in the waters off Iran as well as in Iraq and Yemen in late April emerged shortly after the Trump administration announced it was clamping down further on Iran’s economy by ending waivers to sanctions on buyers of Iranian crude oil.

The administration went a step beyond that on Friday, announcing penalties that target Iran’s largest petrochemical company.

 

Khafee

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
12,324
Reactions
24,463 1,293 0
Iran condemns new US sanctions on petrochemicals
08 June 2019

TEHRAN, Iran (AP) — Iran has condemned new U.S. sanctions targeting its petrochemical industry, saying they prove President Donald Trump is not serious about pursuing negotiations.

Foreign Ministry spokesman Abbas Mousavi was quoted by state TV on Saturday as saying the move amounts to “economic terrorism” and is in line with other hostile American policies.

On Friday, the Trump administration imposed sanctions on Iran’s largest petrochemical company for allegedly doing business with the paramilitary Revolutionary Guard, which the White House branded a terrorist organization in April.

Trump has ramped up sanctions on Iran since withdrawing the United States from Iran’s 2015 nuclear accord with world powers last year, while saying as recently as this week that he is open to talks with Tehran.

 

Khafee

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
12,324
Reactions
24,463 1,293 0
Iran condemns new US sanctions on petrochemicals
08 June 2019

TEHRAN, Iran (AP) — Iran has condemned new U.S. sanctions targeting its petrochemical industry, saying they prove President Donald Trump is not serious about pursuing negotiations.

Foreign Ministry spokesman Abbas Mousavi was quoted by state TV on Saturday as saying the move amounts to “economic terrorism” and is in line with other hostile American policies.

On Friday, the Trump administration imposed sanctions on Iran’s largest petrochemical company for allegedly doing business with the paramilitary Revolutionary Guard, which the White House branded a terrorist organization in April.

Trump has ramped up sanctions on Iran since withdrawing the United States from Iran’s 2015 nuclear accord with world powers last year, while saying as recently as this week that he is open to talks with Tehran.

 

Khafee

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
12,324
Reactions
24,463 1,293 0
Iranian Oil Minister Admits Difficulty of Circumventing US Sanctions
9 June, 2019
uls5t7le67le68l68delre68l.jpg

Iranian Oil Minister Bijan Zanganeh

London- Asharq Al-Awsat

Iran’s Oil Minister Bijan Namdar Zanganeh admitted that the United States was “mature” in putting smart sanctions on Iran.

He said the new round of US sanctions imposed on the country are markedly different and effective than the previous ones, but stressed that Iran is finding ways to circumvent them and overcome the current circumstances.

In May, Washington moved to cut Iran's oil production to zero by imposing sanctions on countries buying Iranian crude.

Iran's sales declined from 2.7 million barrels per day to less than 400,000 barrels, according to the latest oil reports.

According to Zanganeh, the US has reached an “evil maturity” in tightening the noose on Iran’s economy using “smart sanctions” over the past six years.

“The most severe organized sanctions in history are currently being imposed on Iran,” he told the Iranian Parliament’s official website, ICANA.

The Americans want to block all of Iran’s moves to sidestep sanctions, he said, adding that Tehran has found ways to circumvent them.

“We have unofficial or unconventional sales, all of which are secret, because if they were made known, America would have immediately blocked them,” he explained.

“When all conventional means for selling oil are blocked, selling through unconventional means gets more difficult, as well,” he stressed, noting that Iran will not give up in this economic war waged against it.

Zanganeh also pointed out that his country is not planning to leave the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) despite being treated like an enemy by some fellow members.

“Iran has no plans to leave OPEC...and regrets that some members of OPEC have turned this organization into a political forum for confronting two founding members of OPEC, meaning Iran and Venezuela,” Reuters quoted him as saying.

“Currently, if a vessel moves towards Iranian ports, it will be subject to sanctions from other countries’ ports,” he said, revealing the challenges facing the circumvention process.

According to Zanganeh, Iran's Oil Ministry receives 10 orders a day, 70 percent of which are “not real,” referring to attempts to obtain information on means through which Iran sells its oil, transfers funds, and circumvents sanctions.

He said the previous sanctions were under UN supervision, but the current ones are monitored by the United States alone.

In the new rounds of sanctions, he said, Washington has added Iran's natural gas condensates to the list while sanctions on shipping and banking, compared with the last round, have intensified.

 

Khafee

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
12,324
Reactions
24,463 1,293 0
Iranian Oil Minister Admits Difficulty of Circumventing US Sanctions
9 June, 2019
uls5t7le67le68l68delre68l.jpg

Iranian Oil Minister Bijan Zanganeh

London- Asharq Al-Awsat

Iran’s Oil Minister Bijan Namdar Zanganeh admitted that the United States was “mature” in putting smart sanctions on Iran.

He said the new round of US sanctions imposed on the country are markedly different and effective than the previous ones, but stressed that Iran is finding ways to circumvent them and overcome the current circumstances.

In May, Washington moved to cut Iran's oil production to zero by imposing sanctions on countries buying Iranian crude.

Iran's sales declined from 2.7 million barrels per day to less than 400,000 barrels, according to the latest oil reports.

According to Zanganeh, the US has reached an “evil maturity” in tightening the noose on Iran’s economy using “smart sanctions” over the past six years.

“The most severe organized sanctions in history are currently being imposed on Iran,” he told the Iranian Parliament’s official website, ICANA.

The Americans want to block all of Iran’s moves to sidestep sanctions, he said, adding that Tehran has found ways to circumvent them.

“We have unofficial or unconventional sales, all of which are secret, because if they were made known, America would have immediately blocked them,” he explained.

“When all conventional means for selling oil are blocked, selling through unconventional means gets more difficult, as well,” he stressed, noting that Iran will not give up in this economic war waged against it.

Zanganeh also pointed out that his country is not planning to leave the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) despite being treated like an enemy by some fellow members.

“Iran has no plans to leave OPEC...and regrets that some members of OPEC have turned this organization into a political forum for confronting two founding members of OPEC, meaning Iran and Venezuela,” Reuters quoted him as saying.

“Currently, if a vessel moves towards Iranian ports, it will be subject to sanctions from other countries’ ports,” he said, revealing the challenges facing the circumvention process.

According to Zanganeh, Iran's Oil Ministry receives 10 orders a day, 70 percent of which are “not real,” referring to attempts to obtain information on means through which Iran sells its oil, transfers funds, and circumvents sanctions.

He said the previous sanctions were under UN supervision, but the current ones are monitored by the United States alone.

In the new rounds of sanctions, he said, Washington has added Iran's natural gas condensates to the list while sanctions on shipping and banking, compared with the last round, have intensified.

 

Khafee

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
12,324
Reactions
24,463 1,293 0
Iran Sets Conditions for Ensuring Success of Japan’s PM Mediation
9 June, 2019
download_1.jpg

Japan's Prime Minister Shinzo Abe greets Iran's President Hassan Rouhani (R) during the annual meeting of the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos January 22, 2014. (File Photo: Reuters)

London- Asharq Al-Awsat

Iran's Supreme National Security Council determined the conditions to ensure the success of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's scheduled visit to Tehran next Wednesday to reduce tension between Iran and the United States.

In a note on Saturday, Spokesman for the Supreme National Security Council Keivan Khosravi wrote that the upcoming visit of Abe to Iran will definitely be an important event in consolidating and developing friendly relations between the two countries in various fields.

Abe's trip to Iran will be the first visit by a Japanese prime minister in over 40 years and has become particularly important regarding intensive diplomacy between Iran and the US and tensions in the region.

“An effort to bring the US back to the Iran nuclear deal, compensating Iran for the loses it has sustained following the US withdrawal from the JCPOA and removing all transnational sanctions against the Islamic Republic could be a guarantee for the success of the upcoming visit of the Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe to Tehran,” stated Khosravi.

Khosravi did not comment on reports that Japan had received positive signals from Tehran over Tokyo's mediation efforts.

A Japanese government spokesman said Thursday that Tokyo would make efforts to be useful, pointing out that Abe is set to meet with Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and President Hasan Rouhani.

He went on to say that Japan’s approach towards legal and political norms has been approved by the international community, and has not been hampered by extreme measures.

Japanese Foreign Minister Taro Kono is likely to arrive in Iran prior to Abe’s visit and will hold meetings with his Iranian counterpart Mohammad Javad Zarif to discuss Abe's agenda, Japan’s Kyodo news agency reported.

“The best that Abe can say is to propose to Iran’s Supreme Leader to sit down with the US president without any pre-conditions,” a former Japanese diplomat told Reuters.

A former Japanese diplomat noted that Abe may be taking a risk but "I don’t think so – I don’t think Iran will treat Mr Abe badly. I don’t think Iran will let the prime minister go home empty handed."

Over the past month, Tokyo has been exchanging letters between Tehran and Washington, along with attempts from Switzerland, Oman, and Iraq.

US President Donald Trump welcomed at the end of month Abe's contribution to the Iran issue.

Japan has sent mixed messages about its position on developing relations with Iran. However, Tokyo's position in support of the nuclear deal following US withdrawal has sent messages encouraging Tehran to approach Tokyo in search of mediation.

The Iranian government had expressed its desire to expand the scope of the nuclear agreement to include other countries when the Iranian president put forward the idea of continuing the nuclear agreement without the United States.

Abe expressed his support for Iran's stay in the nuclear deal during consultations with Rouhani at the end of September on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly in New York.

Two months before the meeting, the US administration had asked Japan to stop importing Iranian oil, which accounted for 5 percent of Japan's total imports while 90 percent of its imports come from Saudi Arabia and UAE.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Abbas Mousavi indicated that additional sanctions imposed on Iran by the United States show that Washington’s offer of talks is not genuine.

Washington placed sanctions on Iran’s largest petrochemical holding group on Friday for indirectly supporting the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), a step it said aimed to dry up revenues to the elite Iranian military force but that analysts called largely symbolic, according to Reuters.

Trump said earlier this month that he would be willing to talk to Iran, and Foreign Minister Mike Pompeo said he was willing to sit at the negotiating table without preconditions.

The Iranian Foreign Ministry announced it was only necessary to wait one week until the claim of President Trump about talks with Iran were proven to be hollow.

“The US policy of maximum pressure is a defeated policy,” Mousavi said in a statement.

In recent weeks, tensions have risen between Iran and the US after Washington sent more military forces to the Middle East, including an aircraft carrier, B-52 bombers, and Patriot missiles, in a show of force against what US officials call Iranian threats to US troops and interests in the region.

State-owned ISNA news agency reported that Iran’s Defence Minister Amir Hatami noted the presence of US warships in the region on Saturday and said that Iran's enemies are afraid of conflict because of the country’s advanced offensive and defensive power.

“They are afraid of any kind of war or possible conflict with Iran,” he said, also noting that US offers of talks without preconditions are false.

"Iran's enemies, particularly the Great Satan America, and the Zionists, seize every opportunity such as explosions in a few ships in Fujairah, UAE, to level accusations against the Islamic Republic of Iran,” he concluded.

 

Khafee

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
12,324
Reactions
24,463 1,293 0
Iran Sets Conditions for Ensuring Success of Japan’s PM Mediation
9 June, 2019
download_1.jpg

Japan's Prime Minister Shinzo Abe greets Iran's President Hassan Rouhani (R) during the annual meeting of the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos January 22, 2014. (File Photo: Reuters)

London- Asharq Al-Awsat

Iran's Supreme National Security Council determined the conditions to ensure the success of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's scheduled visit to Tehran next Wednesday to reduce tension between Iran and the United States.

In a note on Saturday, Spokesman for the Supreme National Security Council Keivan Khosravi wrote that the upcoming visit of Abe to Iran will definitely be an important event in consolidating and developing friendly relations between the two countries in various fields.

Abe's trip to Iran will be the first visit by a Japanese prime minister in over 40 years and has become particularly important regarding intensive diplomacy between Iran and the US and tensions in the region.

“An effort to bring the US back to the Iran nuclear deal, compensating Iran for the loses it has sustained following the US withdrawal from the JCPOA and removing all transnational sanctions against the Islamic Republic could be a guarantee for the success of the upcoming visit of the Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe to Tehran,” stated Khosravi.

Khosravi did not comment on reports that Japan had received positive signals from Tehran over Tokyo's mediation efforts.

A Japanese government spokesman said Thursday that Tokyo would make efforts to be useful, pointing out that Abe is set to meet with Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and President Hasan Rouhani.

He went on to say that Japan’s approach towards legal and political norms has been approved by the international community, and has not been hampered by extreme measures.

Japanese Foreign Minister Taro Kono is likely to arrive in Iran prior to Abe’s visit and will hold meetings with his Iranian counterpart Mohammad Javad Zarif to discuss Abe's agenda, Japan’s Kyodo news agency reported.

“The best that Abe can say is to propose to Iran’s Supreme Leader to sit down with the US president without any pre-conditions,” a former Japanese diplomat told Reuters.

A former Japanese diplomat noted that Abe may be taking a risk but "I don’t think so – I don’t think Iran will treat Mr Abe badly. I don’t think Iran will let the prime minister go home empty handed."

Over the past month, Tokyo has been exchanging letters between Tehran and Washington, along with attempts from Switzerland, Oman, and Iraq.

US President Donald Trump welcomed at the end of month Abe's contribution to the Iran issue.

Japan has sent mixed messages about its position on developing relations with Iran. However, Tokyo's position in support of the nuclear deal following US withdrawal has sent messages encouraging Tehran to approach Tokyo in search of mediation.

The Iranian government had expressed its desire to expand the scope of the nuclear agreement to include other countries when the Iranian president put forward the idea of continuing the nuclear agreement without the United States.

Abe expressed his support for Iran's stay in the nuclear deal during consultations with Rouhani at the end of September on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly in New York.

Two months before the meeting, the US administration had asked Japan to stop importing Iranian oil, which accounted for 5 percent of Japan's total imports while 90 percent of its imports come from Saudi Arabia and UAE.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Abbas Mousavi indicated that additional sanctions imposed on Iran by the United States show that Washington’s offer of talks is not genuine.

Washington placed sanctions on Iran’s largest petrochemical holding group on Friday for indirectly supporting the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), a step it said aimed to dry up revenues to the elite Iranian military force but that analysts called largely symbolic, according to Reuters.

Trump said earlier this month that he would be willing to talk to Iran, and Foreign Minister Mike Pompeo said he was willing to sit at the negotiating table without preconditions.

The Iranian Foreign Ministry announced it was only necessary to wait one week until the claim of President Trump about talks with Iran were proven to be hollow.

“The US policy of maximum pressure is a defeated policy,” Mousavi said in a statement.

In recent weeks, tensions have risen between Iran and the US after Washington sent more military forces to the Middle East, including an aircraft carrier, B-52 bombers, and Patriot missiles, in a show of force against what US officials call Iranian threats to US troops and interests in the region.

State-owned ISNA news agency reported that Iran’s Defence Minister Amir Hatami noted the presence of US warships in the region on Saturday and said that Iran's enemies are afraid of conflict because of the country’s advanced offensive and defensive power.

“They are afraid of any kind of war or possible conflict with Iran,” he said, also noting that US offers of talks without preconditions are false.

"Iran's enemies, particularly the Great Satan America, and the Zionists, seize every opportunity such as explosions in a few ships in Fujairah, UAE, to level accusations against the Islamic Republic of Iran,” he concluded.

 

Khafee

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
12,324
Reactions
24,463 1,293 0
IAEA chief worried about rising tension over Iran nuclear issue
10 June 2019

7787

FILE PHOTO: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Yukiya Amano addresses a news conference during a board of governors meeting at the IAEA headquarters in Vienna, Austria March 4, 2019. REUTERS/Leonhard Foeger

VIENNA (Reuters) - The U.N. atomic watchdog’s chief said on Monday he was worried about rising tensions over Iran’s nuclear program and called for de-escalation through dialogue, departing from his usual guarded language on the country.

Washington has ratcheted up pressure on Tehran over what it sees as its nefarious role in the region. It has tightened already punishing economic sanctions, and deployed an aircraft carrier and other extra hardware to the Middle East in response to what it said was a threat from Iran.

Tehran has responded by threatening to abandon some of the restrictions on its nuclear activities imposed by its landmark 2015 deal with major powers, which also lifted international sanctions against the country.

“I am worried about increasing tensions over the Iranian nuclear issue,” International Atomic Energy Agency chief Yukiya Amano said in a speech to a meeting of the IAEA’s 35-nation Board of Governors, one of its main decision-making bodies.

The United States pulled out of the 2015 deal - the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action - a year ago and reinstated its sanctions. European powers are scrambling to do what little they can to protect Iranian oil sales and other trade.

Amano said he hoped “that ways can be found to reduce current tensions through dialogue. It is essential that Iran fully implements its nuclear-related commitments under the JCPOA.”

Reporting by Francois Murphy; Editing by John Stonestreet and Raissa Kasolowsky

 

Khafee

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
12,324
Reactions
24,463 1,293 0
IAEA chief worried about rising tension over Iran nuclear issue
10 June 2019

View attachment 7787
FILE PHOTO: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Yukiya Amano addresses a news conference during a board of governors meeting at the IAEA headquarters in Vienna, Austria March 4, 2019. REUTERS/Leonhard Foeger

VIENNA (Reuters) - The U.N. atomic watchdog’s chief said on Monday he was worried about rising tensions over Iran’s nuclear program and called for de-escalation through dialogue, departing from his usual guarded language on the country.

Washington has ratcheted up pressure on Tehran over what it sees as its nefarious role in the region. It has tightened already punishing economic sanctions, and deployed an aircraft carrier and other extra hardware to the Middle East in response to what it said was a threat from Iran.

Tehran has responded by threatening to abandon some of the restrictions on its nuclear activities imposed by its landmark 2015 deal with major powers, which also lifted international sanctions against the country.

“I am worried about increasing tensions over the Iranian nuclear issue,” International Atomic Energy Agency chief Yukiya Amano said in a speech to a meeting of the IAEA’s 35-nation Board of Governors, one of its main decision-making bodies.

The United States pulled out of the 2015 deal - the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action - a year ago and reinstated its sanctions. European powers are scrambling to do what little they can to protect Iranian oil sales and other trade.

Amano said he hoped “that ways can be found to reduce current tensions through dialogue. It is essential that Iran fully implements its nuclear-related commitments under the JCPOA.”

Reporting by Francois Murphy; Editing by John Stonestreet and Raissa Kasolowsky

 
Top