5 Weapons of War That Should Never Be Used

#1

Combat Medic

SENIOR MEMBER
Ratings
9 876 0
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Messages
1,525
Ratings
885
Country
USA
Location
United Arab Emirates
5 Weapons of War That Should Never Be Used



Most weapons of war, from pistols to fighter planes, are generally thought of as legitimate and — considering they are meant to kill — fairly humane tools of war. These weapons can be used in a way that their ability to kill and maim is focused on an individual, legitimate target, whether it be an enemy combatant, vehicle, or facility. Such weapons are also designed to kill relatively quickly, if for no other reason than efficiency.

Then there are weapons, indiscriminate and inhumane killers, that have the potential to strike at noncombatants and even affect human civilization on a global scale. There are also weapons that inflict agonizing injuries leading to prolonged suffering and death.

Some of these weapons of war are so terrible they should never be used. Most have been banned by the international community, a positive development for which humanity doesn’t give itself enough credit. Still, their specter lingers due to the possibility of their use by rogue nations or terrorists.

Here’s five weapons of war that should never be used...

Nuclear Weapons

Nuclear weapons are the most dangerous weapons on Earth. The immense destructive power of nuclear weapons, combined with their sheer numbers, makes them the only weapons capable of affecting human civilization on a global scale.

Invented during World War II by the scientists of the top secret Manhattan Project, the first nuke was tested at Alamogordo, New Mexico in 1945. Nuclear weapons have only been used twice in anger, against the Japanese cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

The nuclear arms race of the Cold War dramatically ramped up not only the explosive yield of nuclear weapons but also their numbers. The first atomic bomb dropped at Hiroshima was roughly 18 kilotons, or 18,000 tons of TNT in explosive yield.

By 1960, B-52 bombers were carrying Mk.28 thermonuclear bombs with an explosive yield of 1.1 megatons — or 1,100,000 tons of TNT. In 1945, there were six bombs worldwide — by 1960 that number had exploded to 22,069. By 1986, that number would rise to 65,086.

The end of the Cold War has shrunk the worldwide total by nearly two-thirds, yet there are still enough deployed weapons to kill hundreds of millions of people.

The explosive power of nuclear weapons is only one aspect of what makes them so deadly. Radiation released by nuclear weapons is dangerous not only in the short term, irradiating survivors near or downwind of the detonation, but also contaminating crops, livestock, infrastructure, energy facilities, and other necessities of modern civilization. These areas could be dangerous to humans for tens, if not hundreds or even thousands of years.

In the case of nuclear weapons, there is a third reason they should not be used. In 1982, a study commissioned to examine the environmental effects of a nuclear war found the injection of soot and other particles following a nuclear war would have an effect on the global climate, cooling temperatures worldwide and leading to so-called “nuclear winter”.



VX

VX is a synthetic organophosphate compound not found anywhere in nature. First synthesized in 1952 by a British chemist researching pesticides, VX is one of the most lethal substances on Earth — a mere ten milligrams of it will kill.

A person can come into contact with VX by inhalation, ingestion, or skin absorption. Symptoms manifest within seconds if inhaled, but may be delayed by up to 18 hours if exposed via skin contact.

VX kills by interfering with an enzyme that regulates the nervous system. A person exposed to VX dies from muscle exhaustion, as muscles tire and and the body is unable to sustain breathing.

VX is a persistent nerve agent designed to remain in an environment for days to months, depending on the local temperature. As such, it is an effective area denial weapon. Amber colored and odorless, it is difficult to detect. VX’s viscosity, similar to motor oil, combined with its ability to kill in minute concentrations makes it very difficult to properly decontaminate surfaces and personnel.

VX use in wartime has never been confirmed, although the Centers for Disease Control states that it might have been used by Iraq in the Iran-Iraq War. Authorities believe the Japan-based Aum Shinrikyo cult killed 20 dissidents with VX. A spate of tourist deaths in Thailand between 2009 and 2011 may have been caused by organophosphate pesticides, with victims displaying symptoms similar to VX poisoning.

VX is banned to signatories under the Chemical Weapons Convention.

Sarin

Sarin is a synthetic organophosphate compound similar to VX. Equally deadly, there are key differences between the two chemical weapons that justified maintaining stocks of both.

Like VX, Sarin is not naturally found in the environment and was originally meant to be a pesticide. Developed in 1938 by German scientists, the name itself is an acronym derived from the first letter of each of the scientists who discovered it.

Sarin’s lethality gave it obvious advantages as a weapon. Like VX, victims can be exposed to Sarin through inhalation, ingestion, or skin absorption. Sarin also kills in a manner similar to VX, leading to a loss of muscular control and respiratory failure.

Symptoms of Sarin exposure manifest quickly, and can kill within ten minutes. It is considered a non-persistent nerve agent, breaking down more quickly and easily in the environment than VX. An army can more quickly occupy a Sarin-contaminated area than one doused with VX.

Sarin is reported to have been used by the government of Saddam Hussein against Halabja, Iraq, in which up to 5,000 civilians died. In 2013, the Assad regime used Sarin against rebel-held territories in the Syrian Civil War.

Sarin gas is not difficult to synthesize: in the mid-1990s, the Japan-based apocalyptic cult Aum Shinrikyo cult manufactured Sarin and used it in two attacks. The first attack in Matsumoto, Japan 1994 killed seven and injured 600, while a second, much larger attack on the central Tokyo subway system killed 13 and injured more than 6,000.

Sarin is also banned to signatories of the Chemical Weapons Convention.

Bio-weapons

Perhaps the most frightening class of weapons are so-called biological weapons. The idea of invisible, often living weapons indiscriminately spreading death and disease is a terrifying one.

Biological weapons consist of microorganisms and toxins targeted against humans, animals and crops. Deployed against humans, biological weapons sicken and kill to reduce the effectiveness of armies and terrorize civilian populations. Against animals and crops, biologicals reduce an enemy nation’s food supply.

As the name implies, biological weapons are organic in nature. An example of a biological toxin is Ricin, a poison made from castor plant seeds. Ricin inhibits cellular production of proteins, eventually causing death. Microorganism-based biological weapons include bubonic plague and anthrax.

Unlike other weapons on this list, biological weapons have been used for centuries. In 1346, the Tartar Army catapulted plague-infected bodies into the walled city of Kaffa to infect its defenders. In 1763, British troops delivered blankets from smallpox victims to the Delaware indians, and in the 1930s and 1940s Japan released a number of deadly pathogens on mainland China.

Part of the fear around biological weapons is that they do not discriminate between military personnel and civilians, nor are they restrained by geographical boundaries. A biological weapons attack could easily backfire, as a disease or blight might cross the border and attack the user.



Biological weapons are banned under the Biological and Toxins Weapons Convention of 1972.

Electromagnetic Pulse Weapons

In 1859, solar astronomer Richard Carrington witnessed a violent and powerful coronal mass ejection on the surface of the sun. By the next day, the energy released by the solar storm, the largest ever recorded, had travelled across the solar system and struck Earth.

The resulting geomagnetic storm on Earth triggered displays of the aurora borealis as far south as Cuba. The storm also played havoc with the primitive electrical devices of the time. Telegraph and electrical wires caught fire, and telegraph operators received shocks while operating their equipment. Still, the damage was limited: in the 19th century, electrical devices were still new and not central to the needs of modern society.

The next time such an event happens, the damage will be much worse. Electricity is now the lifeblood of modern society—without it computers cease to function, the Internet disappears, food deliveries stop, and all forms of transportation grind to a halt. Modern civilization is instantly reduced to a preindustrial level—minus the preindustrial means of survival.

An electromagnetic pulse attack has been hyped by pundits and security experts as an imminent threat to not only the United States, but the entire world. EMP attack scenarios usually involve a nuclear device detonated in space above the United States, the attack carried out by various actors, including terrorists, North Korea, Iran and Russia. An EMP weapon’s effectiveness is in proportion to the energy released, which is why most scenarios envisage using a nuclear weapon.

Despite fear mongering, the Carrington Event demonstrated the potential threat is real. A man-made Event, though theoretically possible, is probably still pretty far off and beyond the technical means of countries such as North Korea and Iran. Such a weapon may even be currently beyond the technical means of the United States.

At some point the threat may move from being theoretical to actual, but we are probably still a long ways off from that. Regardless, the implications of a weapon that can instantaneously deprive modern society of the means to sustain itself are terrifying.
 
#2

BigBIgFan

NEW RECRUIT
Ratings
0 9 0
Joined
Apr 21, 2015
Messages
13
Ratings
9
Country
USA
Location
American Samoa
"Regardless, the implications of a weapon that can instantaneously deprive modern society of the means to sustain itself are terrifying"

Indeed, I'm not sold on the EMP being in the top 5, I'd tend to replace it with psyops which is the art of deceiving mass numbers of people for the betterment of a few. False flag events and such designed to sway public opinion to do as you want to do, etc... are evil.

An EMP however is indeed terrifying, the sheer number of people who rely on technology of some sort to work, pay for food and survive is much too high. What would you do without water, electricity, food, money, stores and police protection if an EMP took out a huge section of our technology?? Scary!
 
#3

pcgamer

NEW RECRUIT
Ratings
0 5 0
Joined
Jan 30, 2015
Messages
22
Ratings
5
Country
India
Location
India
It's unbelievable. How can those savage beasts justify what they are doing and call it sacred? The good thing is, like everything, it's not going to last for a long time. They are going to fall sooner rather than later. But then something new will come up. That's how it has always been.
 
#4

Redheart

SENIOR MEMBER
Ratings
0 318 0
Joined
Dec 26, 2014
Messages
1,239
Ratings
318
Country
USA
Location
USA
Should there be a third world war, and there will be one in the distant future then I'm sure the nuclear, chemical and bio-weapon will be used. After all everyone wants to win wars and if you can't win, then instead of serving the victors, mutual destruction might be quite tempting . . . to the losers.
 
#5
Ratings
0 185 0
Joined
Dec 4, 2014
Messages
161
Ratings
185
Country
Jordan
Location
USA
I suppose white phosphorus is part of bio-weapons? A very terrifying weapon that only the truly evil like US and Israeli governments can use.. (In falluja and in gaza)
 
#6
Ratings
0 47 0
Joined
Apr 18, 2015
Messages
187
Ratings
47
Country
USA
Location
Philippines
If these methods are ever used in war, it will be the end of the world. All we need is one country to start it and the others will retaliate. Nothing will be left and infrastructure will be nonexistent. There will be radioactive fallout and sickness and disease will strike the world.
 
#7
Ratings
0 1 0
Joined
Apr 27, 2015
Messages
2
Ratings
1
Country
France
Location
France
I'd heard of the first of these, but EMP is news to me. We have gone and created some seriously, stupidly powerful stuff... But the thing that frightens me a lot is the thought that so many different actors across the world's respective militaries potentially have or have access to, weapons like these. It's like we're in a perpetual state of Cold War, only without the ridiculous postering and political ideological conflicts pushing us further towards an actual conflict. Everyone has gone and invented some kind of mass killing weapon, be it VX, sarin, or a nuclear device, so we're in a constant state of Mutually Assured Destruction again. And we're just going further and further with our aims to possess these devices. A weapon that can be detonated in space and reduce the world to the cave-man era? Great... What are we aiming to achieve by creating this?
 
#8

Scorpion

THINK TANK
Ratings
25 1,876 0
Joined
Nov 27, 2014
Messages
2,740
Ratings
1,901
Country
Saudi Arabia
Location
Saudi Arabia
I'd heard of the first of these, but EMP is news to me. We have gone and created some seriously, stupidly powerful stuff... But the thing that frightens me a lot is the thought that so many different actors across the world's respective militaries potentially have or have access to, weapons like these. It's like we're in a perpetual state of Cold War, only without the ridiculous postering and political ideological conflicts pushing us further towards an actual conflict. Everyone has gone and invented some kind of mass killing weapon, be it VX, sarin, or a nuclear device, so we're in a constant state of Mutually Assured Destruction again. And we're just going further and further with our aims to possess these devices. A weapon that can be detonated in space and reduce the world to the cave-man era? Great... What are we aiming to achieve by creating this?
Si vis pacem, para bellum.

@Gabriel92 :@-@:
 
#9

Scorpion

THINK TANK
Ratings
25 1,876 0
Joined
Nov 27, 2014
Messages
2,740
Ratings
1,901
Country
Saudi Arabia
Location
Saudi Arabia
I suppose white phosphorus is part of bio-weapons? A very terrifying weapon that only the truly evil like US and Israeli governments can use.. (In falluja and in gaza)
What is the UN doing when such law of using WMD is violated? Is the UN that unless that it can't enforce its laws!
 
#10
Ratings
0 185 0
Joined
Dec 4, 2014
Messages
161
Ratings
185
Country
Jordan
Location
USA
What is the UN doing when such law of using WMD is violated? Is the UN that unless that it can't enforce its laws!
America and Israel simply don't sign those binding treaties which say you can't have or use WMDs so they get away with it and they don't have to worry about sanctions from EU or anything..
 
#11

Combat Medic

SENIOR MEMBER
Ratings
9 876 0
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Messages
1,525
Ratings
885
Country
USA
Location
United Arab Emirates
America and Israel simply don't sign those binding treaties which say you can't have or use WMDs so they get away with it and they don't have to worry about sanctions from EU or anything..
Then why Obama was crying when Assad used chemical weapons against his people? The red line that was crossed many times...LOL that man is a jock.
 
#12
Ratings
1 249 0
Joined
Apr 4, 2015
Messages
354
Ratings
250
Country
Turkey
Location
Netherlands
Then why Obama was crying when Assad used chemical weapons against his people? The red line that was crossed many times...LOL that man is a jock.
When he would have acted at the first time a ''Red Line'' was crossed,there would never have been an ISIS.
So the blame is on Obama.
 
#13
Ratings
0 46 0
Joined
Mar 18, 2015
Messages
272
Ratings
46
Country
USA
Location
USA
This may sound niave or whatever, but I don't understand why these weapons were created to begin with. The "mines bigger" argument should have never gotten that far
 
#14
Ratings
0 18 0
Joined
Jan 13, 2015
Messages
125
Ratings
18
Country
USA
Location
USA
I do t even like knowing hat these things exist. I think biological and chemical weapons are the most likely to be used though. They are probably the easiest to create and implement and if the attackers really don't care and just want to destroy a people group, that is a possibility.
 
#15
Ratings
0 46 0
Joined
Mar 18, 2015
Messages
272
Ratings
46
Country
USA
Location
USA
My guess is you're probably right. It's a lot easier to transport biological weapons and not be noticed than something like a bazooka or hand cannon.
 
Top