AESA Radars | World Defense

AESA Radars

Khafee

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
6,746
Reactions
5,889 263
AESA does it...or does it?
1571256587600.png


5mk7cmh - Copy.jpg


Leading Arab air forces have been among the vanguard of air arms that have enthusiastically embraced active electronically scanned array (AESA or E-scan) radar technology for their next generation of fighters. Jon Lake takes a detailed look at the technology.

The jury is probably still out on the total benefits of AESA radar over the more traditional mechanically scanned (M-scan) radars.

Some believe that AESA radar is the single most important innovation in new-generation fighter aircraft. Most aircrew view it as being a ‘must have’, and are fulsome in their praise for the new technology, and persuasive and articulate in outlining its benefits.

However, others do not share their enthusiasm.

As far back as 2012, a US Navy Super Hornet pilot from VFA-81 told me that, for some missions, he would prefer to take an aircraft with the M-Scan AN/APG-73 radar than one fitted with the AESA AN/APG-79 – his unit then having a mix of aircraft fitted with the two radar types.

More recently, in November 2018, an experienced Luftwaffe Typhoon pilot told me that he hadn’t found himself “in one situation where I wanted or needed E-scan”.
He highlighted the excellent performance and capability of the M-scan radar on the Eurofighter and stressed that he would rather have the EuroFirst passive infrared airborne track equipment infrared search-and-track (PIRATE IRST), which was absent on German Eurofighters, than a new radar.

He would also rather augment the existing radar with a Litening laser designator pod (LDP) to give a passive long-range visual identification capability.

Contrast that with some UK Royal Air Force pilots with experience of operating over Syria viewing M-scan radar as being on the verge of complete obsolescence, since mechanically scanned radars exhibit an inherently greater vulnerability to jamming and suffer from an inability to fully exploit the performance and capabilities of new weapons, including the Meteor BVRAAM.

Whatever the arguments, there’s no doubt that the Middle East has embraced AESA technology.

The UAE Air Force’s Block 60 Lockheed Martin F-16E/F Desert Falcons had a Northrop Grumman AN/APG-80 AESA radar when they were delivered from 2005, making it one of the first air arms to operate AESA-equipped fighters.

Saudi Arabia’s new F-15SAs and upgraded F-15SRs are equipped with Raytheon’s APG-63 (V)3 AESA radar, as are the F-15QAs ordered by Qatar.

The Rafales supplied to Egypt and now being delivered to Qatar, are also AESA equipped, using the Thales RBE2-AA, an AESA derivative of the original passively scanned RBE2.

Kuwait’s newly-ordered Super Hornets and Bahrain’s F-16V Fighting Falcons will be equipped with E-scan radar in the form of the Raytheon AN/APG-79 and Northrop Grumman AN/APG-83 scalable agile beam radar (SABR), respectively.

Also, Kuwait, Qatar and probably Saudi Arabia, are set to receive Eurofighter Typhoons equipped with the next-generation Leonardo Captor-E AESA radar, which is equipped with a mechanical re-positioner to give improved angular coverage and performance.

The Eurofighter Typhoon’s M-scan Captor-C radar was originally engineered with a lightweight antenna, big, powerful motors and robust gimbals, which allow it to be repositioned very rapidly and with great precision. It could intersperse the search pattern with ‘loopbacks’ to hit high-priority targets, rather than being stuck in a constant raster scan pattern like many conventional mechanically scanned radars.

Some have claimed that the Captor-C is the world’s most advanced and most capable M-Scan radar, and that, as such, it may offer some advantages over some older and smaller E-scan radars.

When Typhoon was being conceived, Euroradar believed that AESA was not really ready but that commercial RF technology would make it a less costly and more efficient upgrade option, or as a new radar for late production aircraft.

Conventional M-scan fighter aircraft use a moving antenna, which is repositioned mechanically in order to ‘steer’ the radar beam. This requires complex and powerful mechanisms to move the antenna quickly and precisely, sometimes under high g-force.

Traditional M-scan radars produce a single radar beam and usually operate on fixed frequencies – often with relatively limited frequency agility. There is no ability to simultaneously operate in both air-to-air and air-to-ground modes.

AESA radars also use a single transmitter/receiver, making them potentially vulnerable to unreliability – with a number of ‘single-points-of-failure’.

The first in-service fighter to use an electronically scanned array was the Russian Mikoyan MiG-31 ‘Foxhound’, but its Zaslon radar used a passive electronically scanned array (PESA), also known as passive phased array.

This still had a single transmitter but it was connected to a fixed antenna with multiple antenna elements or transmit/receive modules (TRMs). These allowed the radar beam to be steered electronically by ‘phase shifting’, using timing differences between the signals from each element to form and steer the radar beam without needing to physically move the antenna array.

A PESA radar was able to scan a volume of space much quicker than a traditional mechanically scanned radar, and was able to generate several beams, allowing a degree of simultaneous multi-tasking.

A number of PESA fighter radars were produced, including the N035 Irbis for the Sukhoi Su-35BM, the NIIP N011M Bars for the Su-30MKI and the Thales RBE2 for the Dassault Rafale.

The RBE2, in particular, demonstrated an impressive ability to operate in air-to-air and air-to-ground modes simultaneously, and was able to dispense with the heavy and complex hydraulic drives required by mechanically scanned radars, with consequent serviceability and reliability advantages.

But PESA radars came with considerable disadvantages, too. They had modest range capability and, with a transmitter that represented a potential single point of failure, many applications were also heavy and prone to cooling problems. PESA radars are today most often viewed as representing a technological dead end.

The first fighter radar to use AESA technology was the Mitsubishi J/APG-1, fitted to the indigenous F-2 tactical fighter, which entered operational service in 2000, five years before the F-22 and F-16E/F.

Early AESA arrays tended to be heavier than equivalent mechanically scanned planar arrays and their drive systems required more cooling and electrical power. However, the lack of moving parts significantly improved reliability, and reduced costs of ownership, while performance and operational advantages were compelling.

Most AESA radars use a fixed antenna, consisting of a matrix of multiple solid state TRMs, each of which effectively functions as an individual antenna capable of generating and radiating its own independent signal, producing pulses on different frequencies and producing multiple beams simultaneously.

These modules operate at relatively low power, obviating the need for a large high-voltage power supply.

Because each module operates independently, the failure of a single TRM will not have a significant effect on overall system performance, and even the failure of a number of modules will not prevent the radar from operating, but will rather result in a ‘graceful degradation’ of performance.

The AESA radar antenna array can be divided into sub-arrays that are capable of adaptive beamforming, including the generation of multiple independent beams. These beams may be interleaved, allowing the radar to support multiple simultaneous radar modes, including real beam mapping, synthetic aperture radar (SAR) mapping, sea
surface search, ground moving target indication and tracking and air-to-air search-and-track.

These multiple modes can be operated near-simultaneously, providing a significant improvement in combat capability compared to legacy M-scan radars. This means that in a two-seat combat aircraft like the Boeing F/A-18F Super Hornet, the pilot in the front cockpit could be undertaking an air-to-air task, while the weapons systems officer in the aft cockpit is prosecuting an air-to-ground attack, with the radar supporting both.

An AESA radar will typically make a raster-type scan but using a thin pencil beam – giving a narrower and more elongated main lobe than a typical mechanically scanned radar. Because it can scan at a very high rate it can produce more power in this more ‘dense’ lobe, and with reduced latency.

Latency is further reduced because a track can be updated without having to wait for the next ‘sweep’ of the antenna. Instead, an AESA radar can prioritise and scan around the first detection or ‘hit’ and build track information. It also gives a higher quality track at range due to the shape of the beam, providing an accurate enough picture to support a wingman’s weapons via data link.

Alternatively, one beam may be ‘frozen’, or can be kept pointing at a target continuously rather than returning to that target with each raster scan, while other beams scan elsewhere.

Keeping the beam still during acquisition improves resolution and allows multiple targets to be tracked continuously, or for spatially separated targets to be tracked without any degradation in performance.

With an AESA radar using multiple beams, there is no need to rely on a single beam following a set raster scan pattern, or even to use that single beam to interrupt its scan to conduct a ‘high-density update’ on a contact.

An AESA radar will typically change its frequency with every pulse, generally using a random sequence, making it harder to jam. The simultaneous use of multiple frequencies makes life harder for radar warning receivers and electronic surveillance (ES) systems.

AESA radars can also spread their signal emissions across a wider range of frequencies, which makes them more difficult to detect over background noise. The fact that an AESA does not have a fixed pulse repetition frequency makes it a low-probability of intercept (LPI) radar – ‘stealthier’ than conventional fighter radars.

An AESA radar can also use adaptive power management, using no more transmitting power than is needed to obtain the required information for each individual target – resulting in a further reduced probability of the radar’s signals being intercepted by hostile forces.

AESA antennas can also be used to create high-bandwidth data links between aircraft and other equipped systems, and advanced AESA radars offer a useful electronic attack capability.

Many current AESA radars are lighter than early models, and are better able to work with existing aircraft power and cooling. Some now represent something close to a plug-and-play upgrade option.

However, most do require some increase in cooling and electrical power generation capacity, and often some strengthening of the forward fuselage.

The latest AESA radars represent something of a hybrid – adding a mechanical repositioner to a conventional E-scan array. This increases the radar’s angle of regard from about +/- 60° on each side of the centreline to greater than 90°. This allows a fighter to turn away or ‘crank’ harder after launching a beyond-visual-range (BVR) missile, making it less vulnerable to a return missile shot, while still providing mid-course updates for the missile fired.

Leonardo’s ES-05 Raven radar for the Saab JAS39E/F, and the same company’s Captor-E for the Eurofighter Typhoon, are both equipped with a repositioner.
China is also understood to be working on an AESA radar using a similar repositioner.

Russia lags behind the west in AESA technology, but is developing E-scan radars for the new Sukhoi Su-57, and for the MiG-35.

Future AESA radars may incorporate additional conformal arrays to increase angular coverage, such antennas having been considered for the Su-57 and for the Rafale, among other types.

Leonardo has shown the way forward with its Osprey surveillance radar, which uses up to four fixed conformal arrays to provide up to 360° azimuth coverage for a range of rotary- and fixed-wing platforms.
 

Khafee

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
6,746
Reactions
5,889 263
@Signalian Comments on OP, as well as can you tell the diff between APG 80 and APG 83 ?
 

TomCat

MEMBER
Joined
Oct 11, 2019
Messages
438
Reactions
559 10
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Arab Emirates
Don't know what is E-Scan, M- scan, will research on it when free and post an article.
 

Mastankhan

MEMBER
Joined
Nov 29, 2017
Messages
222
Reactions
855 14
Country
Pakistan
Location
USA
Hi,

M scan radars have reached their peak of development and possible cannot be advanced anymore than where they are---every fighter aircraft has them---.

The E scan are just starting---as of now---there is still a lots of secrecy behind the project. It is only available to a very select few clients and the pilots and operators are just learning how to use and operate them---.

We have to understand that it is not easy to bring in totally new technology---which when you operate---you have to un-learn the older technology and learn to operate the new technology---.

Due to their night fighting capabilities---american forces has a saying " night belongs to us---" why ---because they have technology to see in the night and they can equip that technology to every single one of their operators if they want to---.

Aesa is in a similar manner to the night vision---where you can see your enemy from far but the enemy cannot see you with conventional radar---.

How difficult is it---not impossible but time consuming---. E scan is the new technology here to stay just like the 5th gen.
 
Last edited:

mtime7

MEMBER
Joined
Sep 2, 2019
Messages
97
Reactions
60 1
Country
USA
Location
USA
Hi,

M scan radars have reached their peak of development and possible cannot be advanced anymore than where they are---every fighter aircraft has them---.

The E scan are just starting---as of now---there is still a lots of secrecy behind the project. It is only available to a very select few clients and the pilots and operators are just learning how to use and operate them---.

We have to understand that it is not easy to bring in totally new technology---which when you operate---you have to un-learn the older technology and learn to operate the new technology---.

How difficult is it---not impossible but time consuming---. E scan is the new technology here to stay just like the 5th gen.
and with the EW that people are seeing on battle fields today, you will be left useless with M-scan tech.
 

AliYusuf

MEMBER
Joined
Aug 22, 2019
Messages
232
Reactions
499 10
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Both modern AESA and PESA are generally pulse radars with electronic scanning (E-Scan) as opposed to the mechanically scanned traditional pulse doppler radars.

A pulse radar is a system that transmits short, powerful pulses of radio energy and then between those pulses listens for a return produced from a reflection of that wave bounce off an object. Using the doppler spectrum, the return is then evaluated to determine distance, altitude and speed of the target in relation to the radar.

Both AESA and PESA can quickly shift their operating frequency to avoid electronic jamming or the radar system being located through radio direction finding. This frequency agility also eliminates interference from friendly sources or natural effects from the atmosphere. Both have narrow and wideband modes and can be used for electronic countermeasures (ECM) as well as passive scanning.

What is the difference between a Passive Electronically Scanned Array (PESA) and an Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar?

Passive Electronically Scanned Array (PESA)

  • The transmit power comes from a single amplifier somewhere else in the system, which is then distributed to the radiating elements.
  • PESA can only have one main beam and one transmit power source.
  • All elements combine to a single receiver. Each element steers the beam through phase shifters.
  • Because it uses a single frequency, it is more susceptible to enemy jammers
  • PESA is more technically simple.
Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA)
  • The receive function is handled by multiple element amplifiers in the AESA, but it is simply aggregated into a single return and then amplified in a PESA.
  • AESA systems have individual transmit power amplifiers, phase shifters, and receivers with each element.
  • AESA Radar is more fault tolerant and it can have more than one beam in use on a single array simultaneously.
Fifth-generation fighters like the F-22 and F-35 are equipped with AESA radar systems. There are Fourth-generation fighters like the F-16 that are updating their OEM pulse doppler radars to solid state technology. They also may choose to replace those mechanically scanned systems with affordable AESA radar systems like the APG-83 SABR AESA Radar. These optional upgrades make a formidable all-weather, multi-mission fighter like the F-16 Fighting Falcon even more deadly and difficult to detect.
 

TomCat

MEMBER
Joined
Oct 11, 2019
Messages
438
Reactions
559 10
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Arab Emirates
Both modern AESA and PESA are generally pulse radars with electronic scanning (E-Scan) as opposed to the mechanically scanned traditional pulse doppler radars.

A pulse radar is a system that transmits short, powerful pulses of radio energy and then between those pulses listens for a return produced from a reflection of that wave bounce off an object. Using the doppler spectrum, the return is then evaluated to determine distance, altitude and speed of the target in relation to the radar.

Both AESA and PESA can quickly shift their operating frequency to avoid electronic jamming or the radar system being located through radio direction finding. This frequency agility also eliminates interference from friendly sources or natural effects from the atmosphere. Both have narrow and wideband modes and can be used for electronic countermeasures (ECM) as well as passive scanning.

What is the difference between a Passive Electronically Scanned Array (PESA) and an Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar?

Passive Electronically Scanned Array (PESA)

  • The transmit power comes from a single amplifier somewhere else in the system, which is then distributed to the radiating elements.
  • PESA can only have one main beam and one transmit power source.
  • All elements combine to a single receiver. Each element steers the beam through phase shifters.
  • Because it uses a single frequency, it is more susceptible to enemy jammers
  • PESA is more technically simple.
Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA)
  • The receive function is handled by multiple element amplifiers in the AESA, but it is simply aggregated into a single return and then amplified in a PESA.
  • AESA systems have individual transmit power amplifiers, phase shifters, and receivers with each element.
  • AESA Radar is more fault tolerant and it can have more than one beam in use on a single array simultaneously.
Fifth-generation fighters like the F-22 and F-35 are equipped with AESA radar systems. There are Fourth-generation fighters like the F-16 that are updating their OEM pulse doppler radars to solid state technology. They also may choose to replace those mechanically scanned systems with affordable AESA radar systems like the APG-83 SABR AESA Radar. These optional upgrades make a formidable all-weather, multi-mission fighter like the F-16 Fighting Falcon even more deadly and difficult to detect.
Someone please give master yoda a + rating. This was a very good read. It made me further understand that AESA is best radar during bad weather as well thanks to the individual modifications, most accurate in targeting thanks to individual elements emitting/receiving and then combining them to a mutual result. On the other side, i believe power consumption of aesa is huge compared to other 2
 

Khafee

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
6,746
Reactions
5,889 263
Both modern AESA and PESA are generally pulse radars with electronic scanning (E-Scan) as opposed to the mechanically scanned traditional pulse doppler radars.

A pulse radar is a system that transmits short, powerful pulses of radio energy and then between those pulses listens for a return produced from a reflection of that wave bounce off an object. Using the doppler spectrum, the return is then evaluated to determine distance, altitude and speed of the target in relation to the radar.

Both AESA and PESA can quickly shift their operating frequency to avoid electronic jamming or the radar system being located through radio direction finding. This frequency agility also eliminates interference from friendly sources or natural effects from the atmosphere. Both have narrow and wideband modes and can be used for electronic countermeasures (ECM) as well as passive scanning.

What is the difference between a Passive Electronically Scanned Array (PESA) and an Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar?

Passive Electronically Scanned Array (PESA)

  • The transmit power comes from a single amplifier somewhere else in the system, which is then distributed to the radiating elements.
  • PESA can only have one main beam and one transmit power source.
  • All elements combine to a single receiver. Each element steers the beam through phase shifters.
  • Because it uses a single frequency, it is more susceptible to enemy jammers
  • PESA is more technically simple.
Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA)
  • The receive function is handled by multiple element amplifiers in the AESA, but it is simply aggregated into a single return and then amplified in a PESA.
  • AESA systems have individual transmit power amplifiers, phase shifters, and receivers with each element.
  • AESA Radar is more fault tolerant and it can have more than one beam in use on a single array simultaneously.
Fifth-generation fighters like the F-22 and F-35 are equipped with AESA radar systems. There are Fourth-generation fighters like the F-16 that are updating their OEM pulse doppler radars to solid state technology. They also may choose to replace those mechanically scanned systems with affordable AESA radar systems like the APG-83 SABR AESA Radar. These optional upgrades make a formidable all-weather, multi-mission fighter like the F-16 Fighting Falcon even more deadly and difficult to detect.
Since @Signalian seems to be busy, hopefully you can answer: what is the difference between APG-80 and APG-83
 

AliYusuf

MEMBER
Joined
Aug 22, 2019
Messages
232
Reactions
499 10
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Since @Signalian seems to be busy, hopefully you can answer: what is the difference between APG-80 and APG-83
From what I could glean from the Internet articles, APG-80 is full fledged liquid cooled AESA radar. APG-83 is a more sophisticated GaN TRM based AESA but air cooled. The latter thus needs to operate with less power hence sacrificing on range a bit vis-a-vis the APG-80 of Block-60 Desert Falcons. But the main advantage of the APG-83 is it's as is plug-in facility by replacing the mechanically scanned pulse radars of the existing vipers.

However the APG-83 has the capacity to be upgraded to full liquid cooling and operating at higher power ranges than currently possible. But for that higher engines thrust, as is provided in the Desert Falcon i.e. by the General Electric F110-GE-132 engine rated at 32,500 lbf (144 kN), is required.
 

Khafee

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
6,746
Reactions
5,889 263
From what I could glean from the Internet articles, APG-80 is full fledged liquid cooled AESA radar. APG-83 is a more sophisticated GaN TRM based AESA but air cooled. The latter thus needs to operate with less power hence sacrificing on range a bit vis-a-vis the APG-80 of Block-60 Desert Falcons. But the main advantage of the APG-83 is it's as is plug-in facility by replacing the mechanically scanned pulse radars of the existing vipers.

However the APG-83 has the capacity to be upgraded to full liquid cooling and operating at higher power ranges than currently possible. But for that higher engines thrust, as is provided in the Desert Falcon i.e. by the General Electric F110-GE-132 engine rated at 32,500 lbf (144 kN), is required.
As of now, this is not possible.
 

AliYusuf

MEMBER
Joined
Aug 22, 2019
Messages
232
Reactions
499 10
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
As of now, this is not possible.
Theoretically it is possible, with some redesigning. Whether there is the tactical need & budgetary affluence for doing so, is another story. However the SABR AESA and the Block-72 are based on more emphasis on jamming resistant self survival and superior electronic warfare capabilities to last in the war theaters of the current century. Whatever little it may lack in individual radar range ... can be compensated by the presence of AWACS and with LOAL capabilities. Block-72s as a whole are not inferior to the Block-60. Just is built along a separate paradigm.
 

Khafee

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
6,746
Reactions
5,889 263
Theoretically it is possible, with some redesigning. Whether there is the tactical need & budgetary affluence for doing so, is another story. However the SABR AESA and the Block-72 are based on more emphasis on jamming resistant self survival and superior electronic warfare capabilities to last in the war theaters of the current century. Whatever little it may lack in individual radar range ... can be compensated by the presence of AWACS and with LOAL capabilities. Block-72s as a whole are not inferior to the Block-60. Just is built along a separate paradigm.
Sorry Bro, but the newer Blk62's rolling our insure that they stay ahead of the Blk70/72's.

The SAR feature on the APG-80 was lacking in comparison to APG-83, but that plus more is being addressed in the Blk-62 upgrades.
 

AliYusuf

MEMBER
Joined
Aug 22, 2019
Messages
232
Reactions
499 10
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Sorry Bro, but the newer Blk62's rolling our insure that they stay ahead of the Blk70/72's.

The SAR feature on the APG-80 was lacking in comparison to APG-83, but that plus more is being addressed in the Blk-62 upgrades.
Fully agreed. That is why I wrote Block-60. I am not too familiar with the improvements in the Blocks 61 & 62. Thanks for updating me.
 

BATMAN

MEMBER
Joined
Dec 20, 2017
Messages
518
Reactions
521 5
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Both modern AESA and PESA are generally pulse radars with electronic scanning (E-Scan) as opposed to the mechanically scanned traditional pulse doppler radars.

A pulse radar is a system that transmits short, powerful pulses of radio energy and then between those pulses listens for a return produced from a reflection of that wave bounce off an object. Using the doppler spectrum, the return is then evaluated to determine distance, altitude and speed of the target in relation to the radar.

Both AESA and PESA can quickly shift their operating frequency to avoid electronic jamming or the radar system being located through radio direction finding. This frequency agility also eliminates interference from friendly sources or natural effects from the atmosphere. Both have narrow and wideband modes and can be used for electronic countermeasures (ECM) as well as passive scanning.

What is the difference between a Passive Electronically Scanned Array (PESA) and an Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar?

Passive Electronically Scanned Array (PESA)

  • The transmit power comes from a single amplifier somewhere else in the system, which is then distributed to the radiating elements.
  • PESA can only have one main beam and one transmit power source.
  • All elements combine to a single receiver. Each element steers the beam through phase shifters.
  • Because it uses a single frequency, it is more susceptible to enemy jammers
  • PESA is more technically simple.
Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA)
  • The receive function is handled by multiple element amplifiers in the AESA, but it is simply aggregated into a single return and then amplified in a PESA.
  • AESA systems have individual transmit power amplifiers, phase shifters, and receivers with each element.
  • AESA Radar is more fault tolerant and it can have more than one beam in use on a single array simultaneously.
Fifth-generation fighters like the F-22 and F-35 are equipped with AESA radar systems. There are Fourth-generation fighters like the F-16 that are updating their OEM pulse doppler radars to solid state technology. They also may choose to replace those mechanically scanned systems with affordable AESA radar systems like the APG-83 SABR AESA Radar. These optional upgrades make a formidable all-weather, multi-mission fighter like the F-16 Fighting Falcon even more deadly and difficult to detect.
You nailed it bro.
 

Top