This topic is about Iran not Saudi Arabia, if you want to shoot something then shoot the message not the messenger. In other words you're welcome to refute any piece of information mentioned above. And if your problem is that the source is Saudi, then the internet is full of other sources from all over the world that prove them correct, you're free to google them.
About Yemen, the Arab Coalition led by Saudi Arabia which intervened to rescue the legitimacy is backed by the international law issued by the UN. This campaign is supported as well by most regional and international countries, not to mention Yemeni people themselves. I claim that its the cleanest military campaign has ever been conducted in terms of human rights. Of course there were civilian casualties because its a war, but its far better than any similar war.
it's very interesting ! You put some images of human rights in Iran which was made by Saudi Arabia and I also talked about the veracity of the information these images and Saudi Arabia who spoke of human rights while Saudi Arabia is a biggest violation of human rights.
I think Saudi Before addressing the human rights of other countries to create a better human rights situation in his country.
About Yemen, I don't speak on how fight Saudi Arabia in Yemen.I am talking of not respecting the rights of children in Yemen attack.
Yemeni children are being killed in violation of international human rights law stated in international instruments .
According to the UN reports, the one year Yemen conflict, (March 2915 – March 2016) has led to killing of 6500 people including 3218 civilians and 785 children. In addition, 1168 children are injured in the war .
Sources :
https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/n...rabia-over-children-killed-in-yemen-conflict/
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-rights-un-saudi-yemen-idUSKCN0YO2RK
http://www.salon.com/2016/06/07/amn...o_saudi_arabia_over_children_killed_in_yemen/
http://www.odvv.org/page-687-The-UN-Gives-up-to-Saudi-Coalition
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/iran/2012-01-29/al-qaeda-iran
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/18/w...eased-top-members-of-al-qaeda-in-a-trade.html
http://edition.cnn.com/2013/03/10/opinion/bergen-iran-al-qaeda/
http://www.weeklystandard.com/iran-is-working-with-al-qaeda/article/996609
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/mar/9/osama-bin-laden-iran-shared-logistical-alliance-in/
http://www.brookings.edu/research/articles/2012/07/iran-al-qaeda-byman
I have a question, What is the ideology of terrorist groups like al-Qaeda and the Islamic State? And where their followers live ?
But the relationship between Iran and al-Qaeda , I using your links:
For years these bin Laden family members all lived in the Iranian capital, Tehran, under some form of house arrest.
Of course, for Iran the adage, "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" may have also come into play, although there doesn't seem to be evidence that Iran and al Qaeda have ever cooperated on a specific operation.
That said, the 9/11 Commission found that of the 19 hijackers, "8 to 10 of the 14 Saudi "muscle" operatives traveled into or out of Iran between October 2000 and February 2001."
Bin Laden's chief of staff attributed these releases to al Qaeda's kidnapping of the Iranian diplomat in Peshawar, but added that the Iranians "don't want to show that they are negotiating with us or reacting to our pressure. ... We ask God to repel their evil."
According to the analysis by West Point's experts, the Iranians likely were not doing this out of sympathy for al Qaeda. Rather, the analysis suggests, the letter to bin Laden indicates that Tehran freed some al Qaeda detainees in response to threats from al Qaeda and the November 2008 kidnapping of an Iranian diplomat stationed at Iran's consulate in Peshawar, Pakistan.
The diplomat was released in March 2010. The study says one reason the Iranians may have held al Qaeda personnel for so long was to deter the militant group from attacking Iran. Another reason, the report suggests, might be that Iran was holding al Qaeda detainees as bargaining chips for future dealings with Washington.
Last edited: