HeliArmy
MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2015
- Messages
- 73
- Reactions
- Country
-
- Location
-
Hi!
US Army thought it is time for its land troops to change pattern. An effort is on-going since 2009 about it and while the first soldiers with MULTICAM - or with OCP, as you want - was in Afghanistan in 2010, the deployment looks still on-going and not finished.
I think I read articles here and there with criticism of US Army digital pattern camouflage mainly used in 2000's decade. According to these articles, if I remember correctly, this was a big mistake to insist on digital pattern for so much years and finally that's basically a fail. I wonder what's the truth about it.
So, troops concealment is important, hence why my question: MULTICAM, digital pattern, how good was these camouflages? And the new MULICAM is better, or not? Was it an error to try the digital pattern?
US Army thought it is time for its land troops to change pattern. An effort is on-going since 2009 about it and while the first soldiers with MULTICAM - or with OCP, as you want - was in Afghanistan in 2010, the deployment looks still on-going and not finished.
I think I read articles here and there with criticism of US Army digital pattern camouflage mainly used in 2000's decade. According to these articles, if I remember correctly, this was a big mistake to insist on digital pattern for so much years and finally that's basically a fail. I wonder what's the truth about it.
So, troops concealment is important, hence why my question: MULTICAM, digital pattern, how good was these camouflages? And the new MULICAM is better, or not? Was it an error to try the digital pattern?