Obama: Dim hope for end to Israeli-Palestinian conflict | World Defense

Obama: Dim hope for end to Israeli-Palestinian conflict

BLACKEAGLE

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Dec 5, 2014
Messages
3,623
Reactions
1,989 10 0
Country
Jordan
Location
Jordan
dd8f4e7f-7a14-4817-ac7b-ae23641555b4_16x9_600x338.jpg

Barack Obama and benjamin Netanyahu at a previous meeting (File photo: AP)

By AP | Washington
Wednesday, 25 March 2015

President Barack Obama said Tuesday that the U.S. is weighing whether to back Palestinian efforts to seek U.N. recognition for an independent state and that recent remarks by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu dim hope for a negotiated two-state solution.

Obama’s comments at the White House did little to repair rocky U.S.-Israeli relations, which were aggravated by a Wall Street Journal report Tuesday alleging Israel spied on sensitive negotiations about Iran’s nuclear program. The report said Israel acquired information from confidential U.S. briefings and other means and shared it with members of Congress to build a case against making a deal with Iran, which has threatened to destroy Israel.

Netanyahu is feuding with the White House over an emerging deal with Iran and also has come under fire for comments he made in the final days of Israel’s election last week. Netanyahu has voiced opposition to Palestinian statehood and warned his supporters that Arab voters were heading to the polls “in droves.”

Backtracked

Netanyahu has since backtracked on his campaign statements, but the White House has reacted with skepticism.

“Netanyahu, in the election run-up, stated that a Palestinian state would not occur while he was prime minister,” Obama said. “And I took him at his word that that's what he meant.

“Afterwards, he (Netanyahu) pointed out that he didn’t say ‘never,’ but that there would be a series of conditions in which a Palestinian state could potentially be created,” Obama said. “But, of course, the conditions were such that they would be impossible to meet any time soon.”

Obama said he is evaluating U.S. policy on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. But he said that in light of Netanyahu’s comments, the “possibility seems very dim” for the Israelis and the Palestinians to agree to live side-by-side in peace and security.

“We can’t continue to premise our public diplomacy on something that everybody knows is not going to happen, at least in the next several years,” the president said.

Obama also said his disagreements with Netanyahu over Iran and the Palestinians shouldn’t be framed as a personal issue. He said he has a “businesslike relationship” with Netanyahu and has met with him more than any other world leader.

“This can’t be reduced to a matter of somehow let’s all, you know, hold hands and sing ‘Kumbaya’,” Obama said. “This is a matter of figuring out how do we get through a real knotty policy difference that has great consequences for both countries and for the region.”

Fractures in the U.S.-Israeli relationship recently have been played out at the U.S. capitol.

Obama was upset when House Speaker John Boehner didn’t consult with the White House before inviting Netanyahu to give a speech to Congress just as the Iran nuclear talks were approaching a critical juncture. Some Democrats skipped the speech in which Netanyahu boldly warned that an emerging nuclear deal with Iran would not prevent it from developing nuclear weapons, but pave Tehran’s path to the bomb.

"Utterly false"

The U.S. has been leading world powers in negotiations aimed at curbing Iran’s nuclear program. The so-called P5+1 group - Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States plus Germany - is rushing to craft a framework for a deal to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons in exchange for relief from sanctions before a deadline expires at the end of the month.

Netanyahu’s office called the spying report “utterly false,” saying Israel “does not conduct espionage against the United States or Israel’s other allies.”

Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman said Israel obtained information through other participants.

“All the information we obtained is from a different side and not through the United States,” Lieberman told Army Radio.

At a news conference on Afghanistan, Obama said he didn’t want to comment on other nations’ intelligence, but said, “We have not just briefed Congress about the progress, or lack thereof, but we also briefed the Israelis and our other partners in the region.”

When asked about the allegations that Israel spied on the nuclear talks, senior senators said they never gleaned any details from the Israelis that they didn’t already know or hadn’t learned in briefings by the Obama administration.

According to The Wall Street Journal, the Israeli officials did not spy directly on American negotiators, but obtained details through other means, including close surveillance of Iranian leaders who were being told the latest deals being offered by U.S. and European officials. The paper said European officials, particularly the French, have been more transparent with Israel about the closed-door discussions than the Americans.

"Baffled"

Lawmakers denied knowing anything about it. Boehner, R-Ohio, said he was “baffled” by the report and was not aware of any spying.

Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said he did not remember anyone from Israel ever sharing information with him that he didn’t already know or had surmised from news accounts.

“One of my reactions was, why haven’t they (the Israelis) been coming up here sharing information with me?” Corker said, smiling. “I haven’t had any of them coming up and talking with me about where the deal is. So I was kind of wondering who it was they were meeting with. I kind of felt left out.”

Asked whether he was ever briefed in greater detail by Israeli officials, Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., said: “Never. Oh no. I have talked to Israeli officials here and in Israel.”

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., a critic of Obama's foreign policy, said the same thing.

“No one from Israel has ever briefed me about the agreement. A bunch of us met with Mossad (Israel’s intelligence service). That was a bipartisan exercise,” Graham said, adding that he didn’t learn anything new except that the Israelis thought that legislation calling for imposing new sanctions could hurt the negotiations.

“I hope somebody is spying on Iran,” Graham said.

Last Update: Wednesday, 25 March 2015 KSA 12:49 - GMT 09:49

http://english.alarabiya.net/en/News/world/2015/03/25/Obama-Dim-hope-for-end-to-Israeli-Palestinian-conflict.html
 

vegito12

MEMBER
Joined
Dec 26, 2014
Messages
349
Reactions
41 0 0
Country
New Zealand
Location
New Zealand
I, reckon peace won't be possible as of now or the coming years as it is having problems and both the israel and palestinan have conflicts as well and not being solved. I reckon that this is a tough choice and since both the countries are not getting along well and also they do not trust each other as well and not at peace as well. A temporary peaceful solution, would only stop the conflict from happening and also it is not going to solve the problem permanetly.
 

Ahmed JO

MEMBER
Joined
Dec 4, 2014
Messages
161
Reactions
179 0 0
Country
Jordan
Location
USA
This is what everyone knew beforehand, now it's just official I guess. The Palestinians will keep living under occupation for at least one more decade and probably even more.
 

JPB_003

MEMBER
Joined
Mar 30, 2015
Messages
50
Reactions
9 0 0
Country
USA
Location
USA
It's such a tough situation I don't think it can be ended. The only way it would in my eyes, is if one of the countries takes over the other. I don't see Palestine taking over Israel, and Israel would lose a lot of support if they took over Palestine. The whole situation is a mess.
 

Redheart

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Dec 26, 2014
Messages
1,239
Reactions
319 0 0
Country
USA
Location
USA
If the UN recognizes Palestine as an independent state then they'd be a step closer to attaining their goal.

Anyway, the results of a public opinion poll indicated that 61% of Palestinians aren't in favor of a two-state solution. A one state solution would suit them if all citizens [Palestinians and Israelis] had equal rights. I don't see a one state solution ending the conflict any time soon either.
 
Top