Russia Sending Weapons to Syria Best-Suited for Shooting at Each Other | World Defense

Russia Sending Weapons to Syria Best-Suited for Shooting at Each Other

Redheart

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Dec 26, 2014
Messages
1,239
Reactions
319
Country
USA
Location
USA
U.S. and Russia Sending Conflicting Weapons to Syria

Those heartbreaking stories of a youngster killed by a parent’s wayward gun can lead one to wonder: what the heck was Dad thinking? Yet something similar seems to be happening as Russia and the U.S. deploy forces to fight in Syria.

While they’re battling different rebel groups inside that wartorn land—the U.S. is going after the Islamic State in Iraq and Greater Syria, while the Russians are mostly battling other rebels fighting to overthrow Syrian President Bashar Assad—neither of those outfits has an air force.

Yet six F-15C fighters—which can only fight other warplanes—arrived in Turkey on Friday. The planes “were deployed after the Government of Turkey requested support in securing the sovereignty of Turkish airspace,” the U.S. Air Force said. While it added that the planes “will conduct combat air patrols in Turkish air space,” there’s also a fair chance they’ll be used to escort U.S. and allied warplanes attacking ISIS targets inside Syria.

On Thursday, a Russian general said his military has dispatched “anti-aircraft rocket systems” to Syria because “we took into account every possible threat.” The units deployed include Buk anti-aircraft missile systems, the same kind of weapon that brought down a Malaysia Airlines 777 over eastern Ukraine in July 2014, killing all 298 on board.

Both deployments comport with the old military adage to “git there firstest with the mostest.” But the fact that there are no rebel targets for either kind of weapon is worrisome. While Russian airpower is focused on western Syria, and U.S.-led bombing focused in the north and eastern parts of the country, accidents and miscalculations made amid the fog of war can lead to unforeseen tragedies. The U.S. Navy decision to shoot down an Iranian airliner over the Persian Gulf in 1988, killing 290, is one example. So is the U.S. Air Force’s decision to destroy a pair of U.S. Army Black Hawk helicopters over Iraq in 1994, killing all 26 aboard.

“We’re not going to make Syria into a proxy war between the United States and Russia,” President Obama pledged last month.

If that’s the case, it might be wiser to keep such weapons at home.
 

Corzhens

MEMBER
Joined
May 26, 2015
Messages
853
Reactions
111 1
Country
Philippines
Location
Philippines
Now I am hearing about that proxy war. I think that term is very appropriate since by the looks of it, that's what is happening. With Syria as the venue, Russia and the US are playing coy with their moves (they are on opposite ends of Syrian geography) but malice can be seen in their pronouncements. But in fairness with the participation of Russia and the US in the Syrian problem, I am hoping they can put an end to the ISIS invasion.
 

Redheart

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Dec 26, 2014
Messages
1,239
Reactions
319
Country
USA
Location
USA
The two sides won't engage each other directly. The weapons will be given either to the rebels or the Syrian army. Though I doubt that the Syrian army is going to shoot down American war planes should a Russian war plane be brought down by the rebels then I'm certain before long American warplanes will be targeted by the other side. Just a few mistakes and WW3 will be ignited.
 
Top