The Middle East is always at war. It has been so for centuries. At the moment the fight against terrorism is in the spotlight but whether ISIS is defeated or not, the best we can all expect is a temporary lull before fighting breaks out somewhere in the Middle East.
The Middle East is not always at war. It is akin to saying the planet Earth is always at war, which would be a rather pointless statement.
The Middle East has not been at war for centuries.
It had been at peace for centuries e.g. during Ottoman rule.
The fight against 'terrorism' is an excuse used by the US to enslave the Middle East, and the Middle Easterners being of low IQ origin and suffering from poor work ethic, are unable to escape out of those clutches.
Why is it impossible for peace to be restored in the Middle East?
Primarily, due to the USA in the modern age, and prior to that, the UK.
Restoration of the Ottoman empire in a modern form a neo-Ottoman Turkish Empire may be desirable if peace is to be sought in the Middle East.
It's because the U.S and other countries which claim to be helping bring peace aren't that interested in ending the wars. It's obvious that when you support one side, the side you didn't support will fight against the side which was allied to you once you leave.
It is the US who has killed and raped and tortured and injured the most Middle Easterners, more than Israelis, Arabs, Iranians and all others combined, yet the Middle East is chock full of such low IQ retards that they have not yet succeeded in acquiring sufficient conventional and non conventional means of warfare to dissuade the US from engaging there.
That is all the more reason that one should laud the North Korean regime, whatever its other flaws may or may not be.
Unlike the Middle Easterners, Africans or Indians, the North Koreans are a tough nut to crack.
What do you think is the best way to bring peace to the Middle East?
A neo-Ottoman Empire should be established.
Turkey should militarize along the North Korean lines, for example.
If North Korea possesses at least 13,000 self propelled, towed artillery, multiple launch rocket systems and such, then Turkey should possess at least 3 times as much, or at least 39,000 self propelled, towed artillery and MLRS. This is because Turkey's population is at least 3 times that of North Korea's (23 million X 3 = 69 million, Turkey's population = 77 million, DPRK population = 23 million)
If North Korea controls around 200,000 special operations forces, the largest in the world, then Turkey should militarize at the same rate if not higher, and train, equip and maintain at least 600,000 special operations forces.
If North Korea operates and maintains around 5,000 main battle tanks which are mostly outdated, then Turkey should operate and maintain at least 15,000 main battle tanks which are almost mostly outdated. The current Turkish fleet of main battle tanks is actually mostly outdated, consisting of vintage US armour and some German earlier model Leopards.
If North Korea has its own research and experimental reactors up and running, Turkey should redouble its efforts in this area and have at least 3 times as many reactors of the same types up and running. If North Korea can use its Taepodong-2/3 to hit anywhere as far away as 6,000 kilometres to 13,000 kilometres away, Turkey should obtain the same capabilities to hit targets as far as 15,000 kilometres away from land based and submarine launched ballistic missiles.
If North Korea has its KN-06 SAM systems obtained or modified from those delivered by Russia, serving its upper layer of air defense, then Turkey should have its ASAT (anti satellite) weapons up and running.
And the argument goes on and on along the same line.
Essentially, Turkey needs to militarize at least at the same rate as the North Koreans to be the very dominant military power in its region, including the considerations that both NATO and Russia may like to intervene in the Middle Eastern theatres.
If Turkey can militarize at the same rate as I have mentioned above, then both Russia and NATO together will be forced to eat humble pie when it comes to military misadventures in the Middle East. However, given Middle Eastern moderate IQs, moderate work ethic, moderate builts, moderate temperaments and moderate talents, none of this is ever likely to materialize.
Not just Turkey, but all native Middle Easterners, Iranians, Arabs, Kurds, Berbers are just 'moderates', who have moderate skin tones (not the darkest or lightest), moderate intelligence, moderate work ethic, moderate abilities and moderate talents.
That is why their ability to resist greater military powers is nil. Not like North Korea.