Acquisition of J-15 for PAF- Air Superiority & Deep Strike Platfrom | Page 245 | World Defense

Acquisition of J-15 for PAF- Air Superiority & Deep Strike Platfrom

Zarvan

MEMBER
Joined
Apr 27, 2015
Messages
330
Reactions
682 12 0
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Great,
You should be given the MOD,
Have you done CSS ?
No what I suggest mostly is basic common sense. There is no way in heĺl the senior members on the other forum don't know that what I am saying or suggesting is correct. I seriously can't understand why some of them not all but some taunt me or call my ideas ridiculous which they know better than me that those ideas are not ridiculous. Not one bit.
 
Last edited:

Thorough Pro

MEMBER
Joined
Jun 21, 2020
Messages
125
Reactions
314 6 0
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
I think I am a very practical person, I don't wish to purchase every item willy nilly. In fact I hate to spend our foreign exchange on imports. I would love to have everything made in Pakistan.




Sir you are doing pretty much that. Only issue is I start speaking five to six years before Navy when reveals its plans or Air Force they turn out to be not very different from what I was suggesting.
 
Last edited:

Zeeman

THINK TANK: ANALYST
Joined
Sep 4, 2019
Messages
1,054
Reactions
2,688 85 0
Country
Pakistan
Location
Canada
I am really surprised to see four Chinese companies out of top 20 top arms manufacturers....they are quickly dominating this area as well.


New SIPRI data reveals scale of Chinese arms industry
27 January 2020
New SIPRI data reveals scale of Chinese arms industry


(Stockholm, 27 January 2020) New research from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) suggests that China is the second-largest arms producer in the world, behind the United States but ahead of Russia. This research represents the most comprehensive picture of Chinese companies’ weapons production to date.
In the past, a lack of transparency has meant that the value of Chinese companies’ arms sales has been either unknown or difficult to reliably estimate. For this reason, the SIPRI Top 100—an annual ranking of the world’s 100 largest arms-producing and military services companies—has so far not been able to include Chinese arms companies.

Advances in reliable estimates
SIPRI has identified information from 2015–17 on the value of arms sales* by major Chinese arms companies. The research looks at four companies for which credible financial information is available. The companies cover three sectors of conventional arms production: aerospace, electronics and land systems. With the increase of available data on these companies, it is now possible to develop reasonably reliable estimates of the scale of the Chinese arms industry.

China has some of the world’s largest arms producers
Based on estimated arms sales in 2015–17, the four major Chinese arms companies chosen for the study can now finally be compared with the major arms companies from the rest of the world. In 2017, of the 20 largest companies in the SIPRI Top 100, 11 were based in the USA, 6 in Western Europe and 3 in Russia. If the four Chinese arms companies investigated in the study were included in the Top 100, they would all rank among the top 20, with combined estimated arms sales totalling $54.1 billion. Three of the companies would be ranked in the top 10.
The largest of the Chinese companies is Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC), which with arms sales totalling $20.1 billion would rank sixth largest in the world. China North Industries Group Corporation (NORINCO), which would place eighth in the Top 100 with sales of $17.2 billion, is in fact the world’s largest producer of land systems.

Weapon production more specialized
Contrary to most other major global arms producers, Chinese arms companies specialize primarily in one arms production sector, for example AVIC produces mostly aircraft and avionics. Most of the large non-Chinese arms companies produce a wider range of military products across different sectors—covering aerospace, land systems and shipbuilding within one company.

For editors
These new estimates are most likely still an underestimate. A lack of transparency in the arms sales figures of Chinese arms companies continues to hinder a complete understanding of China’s arms industry. This new research, however, acts as an important scoping study that opens the possibility for further research and prepares the ground for a fuller estimate of Chinese arms sales.
 

Cookie Monster

THINK TANK
Joined
Oct 11, 2019
Messages
440
Reactions
1,568 76 0
Country
USA
Location
USA
I think I am a very practical person, I don't wish to purchase every item willy nilly. In fact I hate to spend our foreign exchange on imports. I would love to have everything made in Pakistan.
This is one of the primary reasons why I was looking forward to T129 that would've been the first step in kickstarting Pakistan's domestic efforts into making an attack heli...
...this capability could've increased over time...and it would've become the JF17 of attack helicopters for PAA. I know Pak is pressed on time and has given Turks one year...but I don't think that would be enough...it would be really disappointing for me to see Pak pull out of T129.
 
Last edited:

Pakhtoon yum

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Oct 28, 2019
Messages
1,375
Reactions
2,107 44 0
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
This is one of the primary reasons why I was looking forward to T129 that would've been the first step in kickstarting Pakistan's domestic efforts into making an attack heli...
...this capability could've increased over time...and it would've become the JF17 of attack helicopters for PAA. I know Pak is pressed on time and has given Turks one year...but I don't think that would be enough...it would be really disappointing for me to see Pak pull out of T129.
Why pull out? Sure we may go for z10ME but that doesnt mean we shouldn't invest in T129. It could be a long run project, especially the second version
 
Last edited:

Cookie Monster

THINK TANK
Joined
Oct 11, 2019
Messages
440
Reactions
1,568 76 0
Country
USA
Location
USA
Why pull out? Sure we may go fir z10ME but that doesnt mean we shouldn't invest in T129. It could be a long run project, especially the second version
Im hoping Pak doesn't pull out...but IF all the needs are met through Zulus and Z10ME...for the next 10ish years or so...I don't see Pak investing in T129. Pak isn't like Qatar with money to spare.
 
Top