Philip the Arab
MEMBER
Dont think so without DSCA announcement and senate approval.In Sha Allah we should've sabr in Sha Allah it'll all be well... Sir you mentioned about f-16 are they here?
Dont think so without DSCA announcement and senate approval.In Sha Allah we should've sabr in Sha Allah it'll all be well... Sir you mentioned about f-16 are they here?
Dont think so without DSCA announcement and senate approval.
In simple words PAF or PN cannot afford a specialized platform it shall always be a multi role.J-15 is multirole aircraft with excellent deep strike capabilities , it necessarily doesn't mean it will be used for deep strikes only , It also has a growler version which is what i am excited about
All over the world multi role jet has taken places instead of specialized role aircrafts, due to cost effectiveness and can bee in multiple mission depending on requirement of timeIn simple words PAF or PN cannot afford a specialized platform it shall always be a multi role.
Has this ever happened before ?For security reasons, sometimes things happen without DSCA notification, although Senate / Congress oversight committees know.
I wouldn't mention it, if there wasn't a precedentHas this ever happened before ?
Noted.I wouldn't mention it, if there wasn't a precedent
Thank You for your understanding, when you have time, look up the recent Apache AH-64 Version 6 upgrade, export. No DSCA notification was issued for this.Noted.
In simple words PAF or PN cannot afford a specialized platform it shall always be a multi role.
All over the world multi role jet has taken places instead of specialized role aircrafts, due to cost effectiveness and can bee in multiple mission depending on requirement of time
you are right KSA gave us dollars but we were supposed to return them last year, which we failed to do so and asked for a extension. Secondly we were paying 3.5% interest on it, China gave us a better rate of approx 1.5% so it made perfect sense to return the funds back to Saudia.KSA gave us money to keep our dollers acount at minimum sufficent level and demanded to return it back like a child when pakistan tried to correct its policy according to changing environment which was against the wish and expectations of ksa and this is the reason which is not convincing me that ksa has actually paid for the procurement of new stuff for Paf.Wallah o aalim
So this was not due to diplomatic row rather pure business decision from both parties!you are right KSA gave us dollars but we were supposed to return them last year, which we failed to do so and asked for a extension. Secondly we were paying 3.5% interest on it, China gave us a better rate of approx 1.5% so it made perfect sense to return the funds back to Saudia.
If it was purely due to diplomatic row then why was the whole $3 billion amount not returned.So this was not due to diplomatic row rather pure business decision from both parties!
Never heard of it from any media oulet local/international instead this is being linked with SMQ's statement.
Yes Sir!So this was not due to diplomatic row rather pure business decision from both parties!
Usually media plays its own game?Never heard of it from any media oulet local/international instead this is being linked with SMQ's statement.
Pak media == fake news agenda driven I never trust on them even they telling You truthYes Sir!
Usually media plays its own game?