John Snort
NEW RECRUIT
It could seem like something futuristic but versions of these weapons have been used in the past:
Either we already have weapons that can be used against particular ethnic groups or these weapons or gene bombs aren't too far off.
In 1998, rumors had it that Israel had been trying to create an ethno-bomb that would be used against Arabs. The rumor was proved to be false but with the advances made in genetics I believe that it's entirely possible for such genetic weapons to be built.
Would these weapons be worse than nukes? Unless the genetic engineers who make these weapons are locked away for life what's to stop them from making and using such weapons against people they hate?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_bioweaponIn Nepal, its rulers maintained a malaria-infected Terai forest as natural barrier against invaders from the Ganges Plains. Natives of Terai have natural resistance to malaria, while the invaders didn't.
Either we already have weapons that can be used against particular ethnic groups or these weapons or gene bombs aren't too far off.
Such weapons are completely harmless to everyone else except those who are specifically targeted.In 2005 the official view of the International Committee of the Red Cross was "The potential to target a particular ethnic group with a biological agent is probably not far off.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_bioweaponIn 2012, The Atlantic wrote that a specific virus that targets individuals with a specific DNA sequence is within possibility in the near future.
In 1998, rumors had it that Israel had been trying to create an ethno-bomb that would be used against Arabs. The rumor was proved to be false but with the advances made in genetics I believe that it's entirely possible for such genetic weapons to be built.
Would these weapons be worse than nukes? Unless the genetic engineers who make these weapons are locked away for life what's to stop them from making and using such weapons against people they hate?