Yesterday in Wasit province (south Iraq), a brigadier general of the police was assassinated. There is no ISIS reach to those provinces.
That's not good news, any reason why? Was he targeted specifically or was this intended as a message against Iraqi security forces?
The Arab states surrounding Iraq have taken very failed policies towards Iraq. Prior to 2014, our most important Arab neighbors (GCC) took a stance against the Iraqi army. The fact is the army together with other state institutions are the only wall against extremist groups loyal to Iran. The army is busy with ISIS till this day, they can only put down both ISIS and Iranian-initiated groups by having major support from the US. The other issue is that Turkey is also trying to exploit the divisions in Iraqi society.
Yes, I think they learned from their mistakes. I'm not sure I would rely on them for much either. Iraqi army/state needs to consider itself a sole party in this fight against ISIS/Iran led groups. Arab states will not help as they are against risk taking or don't want tensions with Iran. Or simply don't have experience against insurgent groups like ISIS to help advise Iraqi army on ground. I feel like Turkey has the expertise to help Iraq and it is both against Kurdish federation in north Iraq and against Iranian influence in Iraq but it doesn't want to affect relationship with Iran and doesn't feel Iraqi's would want that.
So Iraqi army/state can rely on itself and US support but US won't take it far to change dynamics on ground nor do I believe they are interested in it.
This is why many Iraqis, whilst knowing some PMU factions are problematic to our state as they answer to Tehran.. refuse to dismantle those groups. Other actors will exploit the vacuum/weakness that will be created to cause us more damage. The Iraqi army/air force/police needs to be a lot more powerful, that's the solution to take care of all the threats. Washington is not so willing to strengthen it.
Exactly, US does not want to strengthen Iraqi army and US has interest in Iranian influence there. I think US is looking long term and sees Iran as potential new Israel. If Israel collapsed and an Arab federation was formed the Israeli's would move to Iran and the US/other powers will see Iran as perfect counter-weapon against it.
This is why Iraqi army need to play safe with all sides but also look elsewhere, possibly in Turkey. However, not sure this is possible with way Iraqi parliament is at time being. So it requires more time.
The emergence of Katai'b Hezbollah took a same pattern as the emergence of the Mahdi army in 2004, the vacuum and chaos allowed them and gave them the excuse/legitimacy. Few remember that Al-Maliki used to send ISOF after the mahdi army, see link below.
en.wikipedia.org
Post-2008 the militia's faded away and only re-emerged in 2014 which Iran saw as the opportunity. Now they're stronger, they're in Baghdad openly and it's become evident who shot all those protesters. I don't see army/ISOF doing this alone without far heavier US military support for the sole reason that they're focused on ISIS which is keeping the army busy.
I wouldn't trust the US nor Iran, US motives in ME region need to be read at deeper than surface level. Same with Iran. They have a media/propaganda/symbolic war with each other but their real motives/intent is to break up and degrade all Arab nations in region. US doesn't have to deal directly with Iran for them to enable Iran. They can allow China/Russia to fill in gap, among others. US sees and Israeli's see value in Iran for future purposes and this won't even require regime change. Like I said, they gonna try to misconstrue their real intentions on the surface but it's not hard to see for those who aren't naive. I would never trust Iran, Israel or the US as they never had good intentions towards Arab states.