No,Is it a good idea to pick a losing design? The article proves how inferior it was compared to the J-20
That is BS.
The design above is more maneuverable than J-20, Just that PLAAF’s demands were different
No,Is it a good idea to pick a losing design? The article proves how inferior it was compared to the J-20
It also said it had to be longer and have a smaller radar. Also weren't members saying that canards weren't stealthy?No,
That is BS.
The design above is more maneuverable than J-20, Just that PLAAF’s demands were different
By that logic J-20 is also stealth wise compromised, as it too has canards.... Also weren't members saying that canards weren't stealthy?
No idea but that's what members said hereBy that logic J-20 is also stealth wise compromised, as it too has canards.
O khan sahab ,No idea but that's what members said here
sir ge @TomCatif snow owl lost the bid with j 20, what was fc31 for?
Different categories.if snow owl lost the bid with j 20, what was fc31 for?
it has.
but why the word FC ? fc was only used with fc 1.Different categories.
F-22 won against F23. But we also have F-35.
I believe "FC" nomenclature is for the export designation.but why the word FC ? fc was only used with fc 1.
Not related,if snow owl lost the bid with j 20, what was fc31 for?
it has.
No,it has.
ok lets wait then.No,
It doesn’t, It looks like a ripoff of TFX Dual engine design