US Armed Forces | Page 8 | World Defense

Khafee

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
12,324
Reactions
24,463 1,293 0
Raytheon to provide Griffin missiles to U.S. Air Force
By James LaPorta | Feb. 01, 2018
Raytheon-to-provide-Griffin-missiles-to-US-Air-Force.jpg

The Griffin C missile shows off its dual-mode guidance system during a May 2014 launch. Photo courtesy of Raytheon

Feb. 1 (UPI) -- Raytheon has been awarded a $105.2 million contract to provide AGM-176 Griffin missiles to the U.S. Air Force.

The deal, announced Thursday by the Department of Defense, comes under the terms of a firm-fixed-price, cost-plus-fixed-fee, indefinite-delivery, indefinite quantity contract that is a modification to a previous contract award.

The Griffin missile is classified as a lightweight, precision-guided munition that can be launched from multiple platforms and is used by multiple services in different combat roles.

Currently, the Griffin is available in two different variants. The Griffin A is an aft-eject missile which can be fired from a common launch tube or from a C-130 aircraft.

The Griffin B is a forward-firing missile that can be fired from a composite launch tube. It's also used in both rotary and fixed-wing aircraft, in addition to ground platforms and Navy Cyclone-class Patrol Coastal ships, according to Raytheon.

Raytheon is currently developing a Griffin C missile with dual-mode guidance and Griffin C-ER that aims to extend the range of the missile.

The contract modification brings the total cumulative value of the contract to more than $210 million, and provides an option for the delivery of Griffin missile variants, along with test and engineering support, if exercised.

Work on the contract will occur in Tucson, Ariz., and is expected to be complete by December 2020.

More than $11.2 million has been obligated to Raytheon at the time of award from fiscal 2016 and 2018 procurement funds.

https://www.upi.com/Defense-News/20.../?utm_source=sec&utm_campaign=sl&utm_medium=6
 

Khafee

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
12,324
Reactions
24,463 1,293 0
Army turns to BAE Systems for vehicle production
The U.S. Army contract is in support of the Self-Propelled Howitzer and Field Artillery Ammunition Supply Vehicle.

By James LaPorta | Feb. 01, 2018
Army-turns-to-BAE-Systems-for-vehicle-production.jpg

The M109A7 Paladin Self-Propelled Howitzer. Photo courtesy of BAE Systems

Feb. 1 (UPI) -- BAE Systems has been awarded a contract in support of the latest Self-Propelled Howitzer and the latest version of the Field Artillery Ammunition Supply Vehicle.

The deal, announced Wednesday by the Department of Defense, is valued at more than $148.8 million and enables the defense contractor to acquire early procurement material to support production of the M109A7 and M992A3 vehicles.

The M109A7 is the latest howitzer manufactured by BAE and is part of its M109 family of vehicles.

The self-propelled Howitzer is primarily used for indirect fire support operations in support of the U.S. Army Armored Brigade Combat Team, according to BAE.

The M992A3 is the latest version of BAE Systems' Field Artillery Ammunition Supply Vehicle, or what the Army calls CAT, for Carrier, Ammunition, Tracked. The M992A3 is a heavily armored munitions carrier that specifically assists the M109A7's ammunition.

Work on the contract will occur in York, Pa., and is expected to be completed by November 2022.

The full amount of the contract has been obligated to BAE Systems at the time of award from Army Fiscal 2018 other procurement funds.

https://www.upi.com/Defense-News/20...Systems-for-vehicle-production/4141517496538/
 

Joe Shearer

MEMBER
Joined
Nov 25, 2017
Messages
607
Reactions
899 65 0
Country
India
Location
India
I'm a little surprised that a twin-engine plane was lost due to engine failure. If the engine had failed during take-off from or landing on the carrier, there might be a good reason, but to lose the plane in level flight? Was it a dual-engine failure? What are the chances of that happening, even on a plane of this age?
 

Khafee

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
12,324
Reactions
24,463 1,293 0
I'm a little surprised that a twin-engine plane was lost due to engine failure. If the engine had failed during take-off from or landing on the carrier, there might be a good reason, but to lose the plane in level flight? Was it a dual-engine failure? What are the chances of that happening, even on a plane of this age?

My gut feeling is that it was a single engine failure, and bad weather took out the other engine.

Twin engine aircrafts are limited by their ETOPS rating. There have been multiple incidents, where a single engine was inoperable, but 99% of those incidents were not fatal.

Secondly, the reliability of a modern jet engine, is much better than a turbo prop. Usually on Intl flights you would encounter an A330, B787, or B777 all of which have particularly good safety records, and single engine performance.
 

Joe Shearer

MEMBER
Joined
Nov 25, 2017
Messages
607
Reactions
899 65 0
Country
India
Location
India
My gut feeling is that it was a single engine failure, and bad weather took out the other engine.

Twin engine aircrafts are limited by their ETOPS rating. There have been multiple incidents, where a single engine was inoperable, but 99% of those incidents were not fatal.

Secondly, the reliability of a modern jet engine, is much better than a turbo prop. Usually on Intl flights you would encounter an A330, B787, or B777 all of which have particularly good safety records, and single engine performance.

Ah, bad weather, choppy seas, missed that clue. Thanks. Your point about jet vs turbo-prop was well taken.
 

Khafee

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
12,324
Reactions
24,463 1,293 0
USS Michael Monsoor 'exceeds' specifications in acceptance trials
By James LaPorta
Feb. 05, 2018
USS-Michael-Monsoor-exceeds-specifications-in-acceptance-trials.jpg

The Navy's next generation destroyer, the future USS Michael Monsoor, successfully completed acceptance trials, the Navy announced on Monday. Photo by U.S. Navy/Bath Iron Works

Feb. 05 (UPI) -- A next generation destroyer named for a Medal of Honor recipient successfully completed acceptance trials, the Navy announced on Monday.

The Navy's Board of Inspection and Survey reviewed the USS Michael Monsoor and its crew on Feb. 1 in order to evaluate the ship's construction and compliance with Navy regulations.

Many of the ship's onboard systems and processes "exceeded Navy specifications," the Navy said.
"DDG 1001 performed exceedingly well during acceptance trials," Capt. Kevin Smith, DDG 1000 class program manager, Program Executive Office Ships, said in a press release. "The industry and Navy team worked together to incorporate lessons learned from DDG 1000. The trials once again demonstrated how truly powerful and exceptional these ships are."

The USS Michael Monsoor is a Zumwalt-class guided-missile destroyer and next-generation surface combatant ship that is capable of conducting anti-air warfare, anti-submarine warfare and anti-surface warfare while operating within carrier strike, surface action, amphibious ready and underway replenishment groups.

The ship is named for Petty Officer 2nd Class Michael Monsoor, a Navy SEAL who was killed in Ramadi, Iraq, in 2006.
The ship was christened in June 2016 at General Dynamics Bath Iron Works shipyard.

Monsoor's mother, the ship's sponsor, broke a champagne bottle against DDG 1001's bow to make the christening official.
Bath Iron Works currently has five more destroyers scheduled for construction.

https://www.upi.com/Defense-News/20...fications-in-acceptance-trials/5821517854108/

***************************************************************************************************************************

2nd Maine-built stealth destroyer passes sea hurdle
By: The Associated Press  
04.02.2018
WS3NMV5ESJDRHF5JX7TDUX7COQ.jpg

Sailors that are part of the crew of the future USS Michael Monsoor pose for a photo as the ship passes Fort Popham while heading out to sea for trials, Monday, Dec. 4, 2017, in Phippsburg, Maine. The ship passed its acceptance trials on Feb. 1. (Robert F. Bukaty/AP)

PORTLAND, Maine — The second Zumwalt-class stealth destroyer built at Maine’s Bath Iron Works has passed its sea test.
A statement from Naval Sea Systems Command says the future USS Michael Monsoorsuccessfully completed its acceptance trials Thursday.

MGUIGWXEERHG3NEC7R5IQPEYQU.jpg

The future USS Michael Monsoor docks in Portland, Maine, after performing offshore sea trials, Wednesday, Jan. 17, 2018. The Bath Iron Works-built ship is the second in the stealthy Zumwalt class of destroyers. (Robert F. Bukaty/AP)

The Portland Press Herald reports the statement says onboard systems such as navigation, damage control, mechanical, combat, communication and propulsion met or exceeded specifications.

The 610-foot-long Monsoor headed out to sea for the first time in December. Its first sea trials were cut short due to equipment failures.

The Monsoor is the second in a class of three futuristic-looking ships that feature electric-drive propulsion, new radar and sonar, powerful guns and missiles, and a stealthy shape.

The cost of the three Zumwalt-class destroyers is estimated at $22 billion, the most expensive Navy destroyers ever built.

https://www.defensenews.com/news/yo...aine-built-stealth-destroyer-passes-sea-test/
 

Khafee

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
12,324
Reactions
24,463 1,293 0
New Black Hawk weapon system passes qualification
By James LaPorta
Feb. 05, 2018
New-Black-Hawk-weapon-system-passes-qualification.jpg

An S-70 Black Hawk helicopter armed with four forward-firing guns, rocket pod and laser-guided missiles. Photo courtesy of Sikorsky


Feb. 5 (UPI) -- Sikorsky, a Lockheed Martin company, said Monday it has completed military standard qualifications for a newly-minted weapons system for Sikorsky-manufactured Black Hawk helicopters.

The comprehensive weapon system designed for the S-70M and S-70i Black Hawk helicopters can be integrated into existing avionics and provides the aircraft's pilot the ability to traverse rapidly between forward firing guns, rocket pods and laser-designated air-to-ground missile launchers onto static or moving targets with high accuracy, the company said.

"Sikorsky has vastly simplified the complex task of placing rounds onto a target from standoff distances by calculating the complex ballistics required for effective airborne gunnery," Bill Gostic, Sikorsky vice president of Global Military Systems & Services, said in a press release.

"Once the weapons interfaces and electro-optical infrared sensor are integrated with the Black Hawk helicopter's existing controls and displays, international militaries can add external wings and weapons of choice in less than three hours to perform a range of medium attack missions," said Gostic.

Sikorsky says the weapons system program has been under development for six years, which included two years of live-fire tests at the U.S. Army's Yuma Proving Ground in Arizona. The development stage was completed in 2017.

Additionally, the weapons system underwent an in-house inspection for qualification assurance, and was verified through the "weapons system's effectiveness and conformance to operational safety, airworthiness and firing accuracy."

The weapons are carried by two external wings that can support four variant weapon stations such as 50-caliber machine guns and Hellfire air-to-ground missiles, with the added addition of pilot-controlled fixed forward or crew served flex fire 7.62-mm mini-guns mounted to both cabin windows.

The new weapons system allows the military to customize the aircraft for a number of medium range assaults and security missions, Sikorsky said.

https://www.upi.com/Defense-News/20.../?utm_source=sec&utm_campaign=sl&utm_medium=2


The addition of the weapons suite can include the Lockheed Martin AGM-114 Hellfire anti-tank missile, Hydra 70 unguided rockets in 7- or 19-shot pods, and the 12.7mm GAU-19 triple barrel Gatling gun mounted on four hardpoints on the Black Hawk’s stub wings.

https://www.defensenews.com/digital....5.18&utm_term=Editorial - Daily News Roundup
 

Khafee

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
12,324
Reactions
24,463 1,293 0
Army contracts with Oshkosh for tactical vehicles
The Joint Light Tactical Vehicle has been rapidly replacing the military's fleet of Humvees in recent years for its tactical ground forces.

By James LaPorta
Feb. 05, 2018

Army-contracts-with-Oshkosh-for-tactical-vehicles.jpg

A Joint Light Tactical Vehicle drives toward it's static display parking spot in downtown Detroit during Marine Week Detroit on Sept. 06, 2017. Photo by Staff Sgt. Grigori Lopezgarcia/U.S. Marine Corps

Feb. 05 (UPI) -- Oshkosh Defense has been awarded a contract for 416 Joint Light Tactical Vehicles for the U.S. Army.
The deal, announced Friday by the Department of Defense, is valued at more than $106.3 million and is a modification on a previous contract.

The Joint Light Tactical Vehicle, or JLTV, has been rapidly replacing the military's fleet of Humvees in the last several years as the need for stronger armored vehicles was demonstrated early in the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

The agreement also provides for 832 kits, which include installation and packaging kits, according to the Pentagon.

Work on the contract will occur in Oshkosh, Wis., and is expected to be complete by March 2019.
The total amount of the contract has been obligated to Oshkosh at time of award from Army fiscal 2016 and 2017 other procurement funds.

https://www.upi.com/Defense-News/20.../?utm_source=sec&utm_campaign=sl&utm_medium=4
 

Indus Falcon

Professional
Joined
Dec 28, 2017
Messages
113
Reactions
206 22 0
Country
Pakistan
Location
USA
New Black Hawk weapon system passes qualification
By James LaPorta
Feb. 05, 2018
View attachment 5484
An S-70 Black Hawk helicopter armed with four forward-firing guns, rocket pod and laser-guided missiles. Photo courtesy of Sikorsky


Feb. 5 (UPI) -- Sikorsky, a Lockheed Martin company, said Monday it has completed military standard qualifications for a newly-minted weapons system for Sikorsky-manufactured Black Hawk helicopters.

The comprehensive weapon system designed for the S-70M and S-70i Black Hawk helicopters can be integrated into existing avionics and provides the aircraft's pilot the ability to traverse rapidly between forward firing guns, rocket pods and laser-designated air-to-ground missile launchers onto static or moving targets with high accuracy, the company said.

"Sikorsky has vastly simplified the complex task of placing rounds onto a target from standoff distances by calculating the complex ballistics required for effective airborne gunnery," Bill Gostic, Sikorsky vice president of Global Military Systems & Services, said in a press release.

"Once the weapons interfaces and electro-optical infrared sensor are integrated with the Black Hawk helicopter's existing controls and displays, international militaries can add external wings and weapons of choice in less than three hours to perform a range of medium attack missions," said Gostic.

Sikorsky says the weapons system program has been under development for six years, which included two years of live-fire tests at the U.S. Army's Yuma Proving Ground in Arizona. The development stage was completed in 2017.

Additionally, the weapons system underwent an in-house inspection for qualification assurance, and was verified through the "weapons system's effectiveness and conformance to operational safety, airworthiness and firing accuracy."

The weapons are carried by two external wings that can support four variant weapon stations such as 50-caliber machine guns and Hellfire air-to-ground missiles, with the added addition of pilot-controlled fixed forward or crew served flex fire 7.62-mm mini-guns mounted to both cabin windows.

The new weapons system allows the military to customize the aircraft for a number of medium range assaults and security missions, Sikorsky said.

https://www.upi.com/Defense-News/20.../?utm_source=sec&utm_campaign=sl&utm_medium=2


The addition of the weapons suite can include the Lockheed Martin AGM-114 Hellfire anti-tank missile, Hydra 70 unguided rockets in 7- or 19-shot pods, and the 12.7mm GAU-19 triple barrel Gatling gun mounted on four hardpoints on the Black Hawk’s stub wings.

https://www.defensenews.com/digital-show-dailies/singapore-airshow/2018/02/05/new-weapon-suite-adds-additional-capability-to-black-hawk-helicopters/?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=DFN DNR 2.5.18&utm_term=Editorial - Daily News Roundup

1st Customer, just like the Blk60's - UAE. Congratulations Bro!
 

Joe Shearer

MEMBER
Joined
Nov 25, 2017
Messages
607
Reactions
899 65 0
Country
India
Location
India
Navy issues more punishments over fatal collisions
By James LaPorta
Feb. 02, 2018

View attachment 5458
The collision-damaged USS Fitzgerald sits in dry dock last year at Yokosuka Naval Base, Japan. Photo by Christian Senyk/U.S. Navy.

Feb. 2 (UPI) -- Ahead of scheduled hearings for former naval officers involved in two separate Seventh Fleet crashes last year that claimed the lives of 17 sailors, Navy officials have issued additional punishments for sailors involved in the collisions.

Six non-judicial punishments were issued by the head of Naval Reactors, Adm. James F. Caldwell in Yokosuka, Japan on Jan 25., Navy officials told USNI News.

Four of the sailors received non-judicial punishments, or NJPs, which are disciplinary actions that can be taken against a service member whose conduct or actions do not rise to the level of warranting a court-martial.

Former USS Fitzgerald executive officer Cmdr. Sean Babbitt and command master chief CMC Brice Baldwin, along with one unnamed officer, were found guilty of dereliction of duty -- the sailors received punitive letters of reprimand.

"In another case involving a [Fitzgerald] officer, Caldwell reconsidered a previous finding of guilt and set aside the action based on his review," Navy officials said.

An enlisted sailor from the USS John S. McCain was also found guilty of dereliction in the performance of duties and received a punitive letter of reprimand, along with other sanctions imposed.

Caldwell dismissed the NJP charges of one officer and one enlisted sailor from the McCain, according to Stars and Stripes.

The Navy concluded last year that the two collisions between Navy destroyers and commercial vessels were "avoidable," and were the result of multiple human errors.

Article 32 hearings, which are the equivalent of preliminary hearings in civilian law, are scheduled for March 6-8 at the Navy Yard in Washington, D.C. for Cmdr. Bryce Benson, who was the commanding officer of the Fitzgerald, and Cmdr. Alfredo Sanchez, who commanded the McCain.

Three additional officers from the Fitzgerald will receive Article 32 hearings as well.

https://www.upi.com/Defense-News/20...ts-over-fatal-collisions/1141517596040/?nll=1

It sometimes seems that the US Navy is more hesitant than the other three arms to punish failures of command. This goes right back to 'Bull' Halsey.
 

Khafee

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
12,324
Reactions
24,463 1,293 0
Low Recruit Discipline Prompts Army to Redesign Basic Training
09 Feb 2018
By Matthew Cox

basic-training-march-1800.jpg

Drill Sergeant (Staff Sgt.) Jonathan Christal, B Battery, 1st Battalion, 40th Field Artillery, marches Basic Combat Training Soldiers in for classroom training. (U.S. Army Photo/Mr. James Brabenec)


The U.S. Army will soon launch a redesign of Basic Combat Training intended to build more discipline after many commanders complained that new soldiers often show up to their first units with a sloppy appearance and undisciplined attitudes.

By early summer, new recruits will go through Army BCT that's designed to instill strict discipline and esprit de corps by placing a new emphasis in drill and ceremony, inspections, pride in military history while increasing the focus on critical training such as physical fitness, marksmanship, communications and battlefield first aid skills.

The program will also feature three new field training exercises that place a greater emphasis on forcing recruits to demonstrate Warrior Tasks and Battle Drills, the list of key skills all soldiers are taught to survive in combat.

The new program of instruction is the result of surveys taken from thousands of leaders who have observed a trend of new soldiers fresh out of training displaying a lack of obedience and poor work ethic as well as being careless with equipment, uniform and appearance, Maj. Gen. Malcolm Frost, commanding general of the U.S. Army Center of Initial Military Training, told defense reporters on Friday.

'A SENSE OF ENTITLEMENT'
"What leaders have observed in general is they believe that there is too much of a sense of entitlement, questioning of lawful orders, not listening to instruction, too much of a buddy mentality with NCOs and officers and a lot of tardiness being late to formation and duties," Frost said. "These are trends that they see as increasing that they think are part of the discipline aspect that is missing and that they would like to see in the trainees that become soldiers that come to them as their first unit of assignment."

As commanding general of IET, Frost was tasked with increasing the quality of training and reducing new soldier attrition.
After compiling the data from surveys of about 27,000 commissioned officers, warrant officers and non-commissioned officers, the message was very clear, Frost said.

"The number-one thing that was asked for five-fold or five times as much as any of the other categories was discipline," Frost said.

"First-unit-of-assignment leaders want Initial Entry Training to deliver disciplined, physically-fit new soldiers who are willing to learn, they are mentally tough, professional and are proud to serve in the United States Army."

In addition to discipline and physical fitness, leaders also wanted technical and tactical proficiency in warrior tasks and battle drills.

BE A SOLDIER
After working out the details in a pilot at Fort Jackson, South Carolina, the Army has approved a new POI that Frost hopes will better instill into recruits exactly what it means to be a soldier.

"We really tried to attack it by getting after more discipline and esprit de corps," Frost said.
One new aspect features a series of history vignettes of major battles that the Army has fought in, from Valley Forge in the Revolutionary War all the way to Iraq in Baghdad, Frost said.

"We highlighted those battles; we tied them to Army Values and the Soldier's Creed and highlighted an individual who received the Medal of Honor or other valor award for actions during each battle," Frost said.

"So soldiers will learn across all of Basic Combat Training at all the Army training centers what it means to be a soldier, the history of the United States Army through the battles and the campaign streamers and the wars that we have fought and they will be able to look to and emulate a soldier who executed a valorous act during that war."

The new standardized booklet will be given to each recruit along with their Blue Book at the beginning of training.
Recruits will also learn discipline by doing more practice at a skill that may be as old as soldiering itself -- drill and ceremony.

DRILL AND CEREMONY
When the war began after the attacks of 9/11, the Army decreased its focus on D&C, inspections and other skills that stress attention to detail to make more time for combat skill training.

"There are a lot of folks that say 'we need to go back to the drill and ceremony because we have lost a lot of the discipline aspect of what it means to be a United States Army soldier,'" Frost said.

"It's not like they are going to be sitting out there just doing D&C all the time. The drill and ceremony is going to be interwoven into when they move to and from places ... so the movements won't just be lollygagging, non-tactical movements, they will be actually executing some team drill and ceremony as they move to and from the chow hall and move to and from the barracks."

But the new BCT isn't all about spit and polish, Frost said.

HAMMER, ANVIL, FORGE
"The other big piece we are doing in Basic Combat Training that helps with the esprit de corps and the discipline aspect and also lends a measure of grit and resilience to [BCT] is we have three major field training exercises that we are going to do now. We are calling them the Hammer, the Anvil and the Forge," Frost said, describing how the final Forge FTX is an homage to the Army's historic ties to Valley Forge.

"That is going to be a culminating FTX which is a graduation requirement. It will be an 81-hour field training exercise with about 40 miles of tactical road marching that is conducted through a series of tactical events and mini field training exercises."

The Forge will include a night infiltration course and a medical evacuation mass casualty exercise. There will be ethical dilemmas soldiers have to negotiate as well as a battle march and shoot, a resupply mission which involves moving supplies, ammo, water to a link-up point, patrol base activities, combat patrols as well as an obstacle course, Frost said.

"If you succeed in making it through the 81-hour FTX ... then what will happen is you will earn the right to become a soldier," Frost said. "You will earn your beret, you will earn a 'soldier for life' certificate, you will get your National Defense Service Medal and your uniform will look exactly like a United States Army soldier."

'GET AFTER THE BASICS'
The new BCT POI weeded out "lot of redundant areas and areas that have crept in that did not get after the basics" -- shoot, move, communicate and protect or survive, Frost said.

For weapons qualification, recruits will be required to qualify with backup iron sights instead of just on close-combat optic sights.
Physical fitness standards will also be increased, requiring each soldier to score at least 60 points on all three events of the Army Physical Fitness Test instead of 50 points on each as a graduation standard.

Each recruit will also receive 33 hours of combatives training instead of 22 hours, Frost said.

Recruits will receive an increased amount of tactical combat casualty care training such as basic combat lifesaver.

The course will also teach "some of the basics that we had kind of lost with respect to communications such as basic hand and arm signals, and we have doubled the amount of basic reporting on the radio communications" such as MEDEVAC and similar requests, Frost said.

SOME QUALIFICATIONS NIXED
The new BCT does, however, do away with hand grenade qualification and land navigation course qualification as graduation requirements.

"What we have found is it is taking far, far too much time. It's taking three to four times as much time ... just to qualify folks on the hand grenade course than we had designated so what is happening is it is taking away from other aspects of training," Frost said.

"We are finding that there are a large number of trainees that come in that quite frankly just physically don't have the capacity to throw a hand grenade 20 to 25 to 30 meters. In 10 weeks, we are on a 48-hour period; you are just not going to be able to teach someone how to throw if they haven't thrown growing up."

Recruits will still receive the same amount of training in these areas, Frost said.

"Just because we took it off as a graduation requirement does not mean they won't be conducting hand grenade or land navigation training," Frost said. "They are going to learn all the technical aspects of the hand grenade, and they are going to learn tactical employment and they will throw a live hand grenade.

"With land navigation, it's the same thing they are still going to conduct land navigation training; they are still going to conduct the day course they are still going to conduct the night course."

The new changes to BCT, Frost said, will hopefully make new soldiers better prepared for their advanced individual training, first unit of assignment and result in a lower, new-soldier attrition rate

"If we can get a more physically fit, better prepared, more-disciplined soldier in Basic Combat Training, AIT and [One-Station Unit Training] then we believe we will have less attrition in first unit of assignment," Frost said.

https://www.military.com/daily-news...edesign-basic-training.html?ESRC=eb_180212.nl
 

Khafee

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
12,324
Reactions
24,463 1,293 0
Army Generals Discuss Next-Gen Combat Vehicle, Helicopter
09 Feb 2018
By Matthew Cox

army-tank-1800.jpg

To develop and field the next generation of combat vehicles, the Army needs to overcome the current problem: Adding new capabilities and systems is complicated by the weight-bearing and power-generation constraints of the original platforms. (Image courtesy of DASA(R&T))

The U.S. Army's next workhorse helicopter must have an active protection system capable of shooting down incoming surface-to-air missiles, modernization leaders told Congress this week.

Lawmakers on the Senate Armed Services Committee's Airland subcommittee pressed Army generals about how the service's new modernization reform effort is going to produce the next generation of combat systems -- from aircraft to armored vehicles -- at a Wednesday hearing.

Subcommittee chairman Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Arkansas, wanted to know how the Army's future UH-60 Black Hawk helicopter replacement is going to deal with new threats such as sophisticated air defenses from countries like Russia and China.

"What steps is the Army taking to ensure that that future platform be survivable in that kind of environment?" Cotton asked, referring to the service's Future Vertical Lift modernization priority.

Lt. Gen. Paul Ostrowski described how the Army is working with two joint multirole tech demonstrators, one from Boeing and the other from Bell Helicopter.

FUTURE VERTICAL LIFT
"We have had flights with Bell's tilt-rotor aircraft, and we have hope that, by late this summer, we will see the Boeing compound coaxial helicopter in flight," said Ostrowski, who is the principal military deputy to the assistant secretary of the Army for acquisition, logistics and technology and director of the Army Acquisition Corps.

The information gained from the two tech demonstrators will allow the Army to set its priorities for the program, which must include aircraft survivability, he said.

"Aircraft survivability with respect to that platform and our current fleet remains paramount to us," Ostrowski said. "It is one of our top priorities within Future Vertical Lift."

The Army has been "investing heavily" to develop the ability to "interdict the particular missiles while in flight," he said.

"This is tough because we are always shooting behind the duck ... in order to defend an aircraft against a ground-based missile, you have to be able to confuse that missile. In order to do that, you must be able to take the steps necessary to create the software to do that -- that takes time and testing," Ostrowski said.

So the Army must "go after a kinetic capability, one that is not dependent on software in order to defeat or dazzle the particular surface-to-air missile," he said.

Just as active protection systems are key to future ground vehicles, "we have to have APS for our aircraft," Ostrowski said.

NEXT-GEN COMBAT VEHICLE
Lawmakers also listened with interest as Army officials offered details on the Next Generation Combat Vehicle, a program that could replace either the Bradley Fighting Vehicle or the M1 tank or both.

"We are looking at all options, to include foreign vehicle design and new development," said Lt. Gen. John Murray, deputy chief of staff for Army G8.

The NGCV will likely rely on an alternative power source to get away from diesel and turbine engines, he said.

Any future combat vehicle would at least have the option to be unmanned, if not semi-autonomous or autonomous, so commanders at the point of contact would have the option to send the vehicle forward unmanned, Murray said.

It would likely have some type of simple artificial intelligence to provide driver-assist, 360-degree situational awareness and computer-assisted targeting and acquisition capabilities, he said.

Integrated active protection, enhanced lethality and lighter weight would also be highly valued in the NGCV, Murray said.

"Whatever we come up with, we have to account for operations in urban terrain ... so that is a lot out there that may not exist right now," he said.

"We can't wait 20 years to develop this vehicle, so we have got to find a solution that we can develop fairly quickly, that we can incorporate technologies as they mature in a relatively easy manner," Murray said.

FCS FAILURE
Cotton brought up past modernization efforts such as the failed Future Combat System, an ambitious effort to design a new fleet of lightweight manned and unmanned combat vehicles and other platforms to completely dominate future battlefields.

But the technology FCS depended on simply did not exist. The Army spent billions on FCS, only to see it fail when then-Defense Secretary Robert Gates killed the 27-ton Manned Ground Vehicles portion of FCS in the 2010 budget while criticizing the advanced design as ill-suited to survive current battlefield threats.

"Would this Next Generation Combat Vehicle put us at risk of something like the FCS again -- that we are trying to build a platform that can do multiple different roles and, if it fails, then we fail across all those roles?" Cotton asked.

Murray said the Army's leadership is committed to not making the same mistakes that led to the death of FCS.

In one of the service's largest mistakes, he said, "We bet on a technology and developed a platform around those technologies and, when those technologies didn't deliver, the platform didn't deliver.

"The intent is figure out what is physically possible from a technology standpoint of what we can do today before we go into development, and then make sure we build space into the vehicle to incorporate technologies that we know are coming," Murray said. "You don't want to deliver something and, the day you deliver, it is obsolete."

ACQUISITION REFORM

The Army is banking on a massive acquisition reform effort to help it make these and other modernization priorities a reality in the decades to come.

In early October, Acting Secretary of the Army Ryan D. McCarthy approved a special task force to stand up a new Army Modernization Command

The command's modernization work will be conducted through "cross-functional teams" that focus on each of the Army's six modernization priorities -- long-range precision fires; Next Generation Combat Vehicle; Future Vertical Lift; a mobile and expeditionary network; air and missile defense capabilities; and soldier lethality.

The concept of the sweeping modernization reorganization embraces rapid prototyping, engages warfighters at the beginning and keeps them engaged throughout the process, Army leaders maintain.

Sen. Gary Peters, D-Michigan, asked how the acquisition reform effort is going to develop and field equipment more quickly when it's the same problematic communities that are still doing the work.

"You've got the science and tech folks that probably need to do a whole lot better job of reaching out to private industry on some of the new cutting-edge technologies and try to examine what the possibilities are. There is not enough of that that goes on," he said.

"The testing community sets unrealistic goals, so there is a lot of failures because the goals aren't realistic -- so the programs die or don't move forward," Peters said.

"And the requirements community always wants to do too much and be all things to all people," he continued. "And so you start putting all of that together in the hopper, and everything kind of grinds to a halt, which is obviously unacceptable at a time when technology is advancing at a pace we have not seen in human history.

"How would you characterize that assessment? Are these legitimate things we should be think about with those kind of communities?" Peters asked.

Murray could not argue Peters' points.

"I would say that you are fairly accurate," Murray said. "We do a poor job of reaching out to industry. A lot of times, it's because of concerns by our lawyers in terms of competition and giving an unfair advantage to competitors."

The Army is interested in fielding equipment quickly, using technology that exists today, but it has to be able to be upgraded over time, he said.

"We have been criticized, rightfully so, for our modernization efforts in the past," Murray said. "I think we have a very risk-averse culture."

The newly formed cross-functional teams will help change that culture, Army officials say.

"I think the Army's testing community has made great strides. We now have, as part of the CFT, ... testers, engineers, S&T experts and, hopefully soon, industry sitting down with requirements writers," Murray said. "So before we write a requirement, we know it's feasible, it can be tested relatively cheaply in a fast amount of time and that industry can actually produce it. And that is kind of what we are after as we go forward."

https://www.military.com/dodbuzz/20...scuss-next-gen-combat-vehicle-helicopter.html
 

Khafee

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
12,324
Reactions
24,463 1,293 0
Air Force Kills JSTARS Upgrade
12 Feb 2018
By Oriana Pawlyk
E-8-JSTARS-1200x800.jpg


The Air Force will not move forward with an E-8C Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System replacement aircraft, officials confirmed.
The service on Monday announced that the current JSTARS fleet -- capable of developing, detecting, locating and tracking moving targets on the ground -- will fly into the mid-2020s, but as officials carve out future battle management plans, a new JSTARS aircraft won't be necessary, officials said during the Air Force's fiscal 2019 budget rollout briefing.

"Instead of recapitalizing JSTARS, a platform which is not viable in contested environments prioritized in the National Defense Strategy, this budget reallocates that funding to achieve an advanced battle management system for the future through a new incremental approach," said Air Force Deputy Assistant Secretary for Budget Maj. Gen. John M. Pletcher.

The new effort will capitalize on new and emerging sensor technologies from air, space, sea and land systems and will take the information in a fused-data direction, Pletcher said. The move was first reported by Defense News over the weekend.

For the first phase, the Air Force is exploring expanding its sensor suite by adding the technologies to platforms such as the MQ-9 Reaper. Depending on how influential the data is, the Air Force could either expand the practice to other fleets, or it may look to another aircraft altogether, Pletcher said.

"It may or may not be a platform," he told reporters during the briefing at the Pentagon. "It's really about taking all the sensors that exist across the domain -- fifth generation aircraft today, unmanned aircraft, space, ground sensors, pulling all that together, which includes sensors that aren't necessarily developed today."

If its a new plane, "it's got to be survivable," Pletcher said. "The point of the Joint Stars discussion, if we recap the current JSTARS, we will have an aircraft that still can't do anymore than it can today … probably [even] less because it will be in a more competitive, contested environment" in the future, he said.

Fusing more systems instead will "enable faster and smarter decisions that will give us the winning edge," Pletcher said.
In December 2016, the Air Force launched a $6.9 billion Request for Proposal for the engineering, manufacturing and development phase of the upgraded aircraft. It had planned to buy 17 new aircraft.

But months later, two lawmakers discovered the service may forgo the JSTARS replacement plan and seek out other aircraft alternatives for the mission.

Georgia Sens. Johnny Isakson and David A. Perdue in August said they were "alarmed" to find out in August that the Air Force may pursue "alternative intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance platforms" instead of procuring a JSTARS replacement.

Responding to the criticism, Air Force Secretary Heather Wilson said the service would decide whether it would pursue the recap program in October. That date was then pushed back to coincide with the latest budget request.

"JSTARS is about battlefield command and control," Wilson said during a speech in early October.
But there has been a capability gap, she said.

"They're very important to people on the ground to get air support where they need it -- but they're only meeting 5 percent of the [combatant commander] requirement. They have to go back and refuel; there are only a limited number of airframes," she said.

Over the Islamic State battlefield in Iraq and Syria, for example, there are a variety of space assets, fighters, "unmanned aircraft, seaborne radars, ground-based radars and we have the ability to integrate information we didn't have in 1991," Wilson said, referencing the Gulf War.

She added, "Can we pull all that information to give a better picture of command and control, and be putting that on the ground instead of in the back of an airplane?"

The airborne command and control plane, a modified Boeing 707-300 series commercial airframe that can fly as high as 42,000 feet, is "extensively remanufactured and modified with the radar, communications, operations and control subsystems," including a prominent 27-foot bathtub-like radome under the fuselage.

The radome "houses the 24-foot long, side-looking phased array antenna," according to the Air Force.

In an op-ed titled, "Rethinking Radar Plane Recap: Will The Air Force Let Down The Army Again?," Forbes columnist Loren Thompson last year wrote divesting JSTARS would leave the Army -- which relies on the plane's real-time reconnaissance -- high and dry and directly in harm's way on the battlefield.

The Air Force "wants to conduct an 'analysis of alternatives' to determine whether there are better ways to do the mission," said Thompson, who writes about on the strategic, economic and business implications of defense spending for the publication.

Thompson went on to say, "That might sound reasonable if the service hadn't already conducted five such analyses that led to the current replacement program. A sixth review of options would come to the same conclusion, which means what's really going on is the Air Force is trying to jettison the capability entirely.

"Whatever highfalutin' rationale the Air Force may advance for this unfolding debacle, the bottom line is that it just doesn't value Army needs as highly as its own operational priorities," he said.

Currently, 16 E-8 aircraft are headquartered at Robins Air Force Base, Georgia.

https://www.military.com/dodbuzz/2018/02/12/air-force-kills-jstars-upgrade.html?ESRC=eb_180213.nl
 

Khafee

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
12,324
Reactions
24,463 1,293 0
Coast Guard Budget Would Fund 1st New Heavy Icebreaker in 40 Years
12 Feb 2018
By Brendan McGarry

cutter-polar-star-1800.jpg

The crew of the Coast Guard Cutter Polar Star operates near two seals off the shore of Antarctica, Jan. 16, 2017. (U.S. Coast Guard photo/David Mosley)

The Coast Guard finds itself in a significantly different budget environment this year -- not only is the service requesting a sizeable bump in funding, the money would help pay for its first new heavy icebreaker in 40 years.

The service asked for a total of about $11.7 billion in funding for fiscal 2019, an increase of $979 million, or 8.4 percent, over its previous request, according to a document released Monday as part of President Donald Trump's budget request.

Last year, by comparison, the service faced a $1.3 billion cut before launching a massive and ultimately successful public relations campaign to underscore its importance to national security despite being the smallest of the U.S. military services and the only one to fall under the Department of Homeland Security rather than the Defense Department.

The additional money for the fiscal year beginning Oct. 1 would include $750 million for a new heavy icebreaker slated for delivery in 2023, according to the budget document. The funding would go toward building "the Nation's first new heavy Polar Icebreaker in over 40 years," it states.

The money "continues efforts to award a contract for detail design and construction to maintain scheduled delivery for a new icebreaker in 2023. Specifically, funding provides detail, design, long lead time materials, construction, program management office support, feasibility studies and maintaining the indicative design, cybersecurity planning, project resident office initiation, and Navy reimbursable technical support," the document continues. "This acquisition is recapitalizing the Coast Guard's heavy polar icebreaker fleet."

The Coast Guard wants to replace the barely seaworthy Polar Star for Arctic missions with a fleet of three heavy icebreakers. Last fall, it released a draft request for proposals from potential builders for a new heavy icebreaker design. The service also wants to build three medium icebreakers.

Coast Guard Commandant Adm. Paul Zukunft has said the ships are needed in the Arctic as ice melts, sea lanes open up, and a race begins with Russia and China to seize advantage in the region.

In other big-ticket equipment items, the service's fiscal 2019 budget also includes $400 million in funding for an offshore patrol cutter. The funding would enable the Coast Guard "to begin construction of the second OPC and Long Lead Time Material for the third OPC," a vessel designed to replace the Medium Endurance Cutter classes on the high seas and coastal approaches, according to the budget document.

The budget request also includes $240 million in funding to buy four new fast response cutters (FRCs), designed to replace the 110-foot patrol boats and to enhance the service's ability to conduct search-and-rescue operations, enforce border security, interdict drugs, uphold immigration laws and prevent terrorism, the document states.

The service's proposed budget request would support a total workforce of 87,643, including 40,863 full-time military personnel, 7,780 full-time civilian personnel, 7,000 reservists and 32,000 auxiliary members, according to the document. That represents a 3 percent increase over the current year, mostly due to an expected rise in the number of auxiliary members.

Overall, the Coast Guard budgeted $7.8 billion for operating expenses, including pay; $1.9 billion to recapitalize equipment; and $1.9 billion in mandatory spending and fees.

-- Hope Hodge Seck contributed to this report.

https://www.military.com/daily-news...vy-icebreaker-40-years.html?ESRC=eb_180213.nl
 
Top