Any more F7p Sqdn left after this replacement??PAF's No.18 Squadron “Sharp Shooters” which currently operates FT-7P will be replaced by JF-17B Thunder "Bravo" (Dual-Seat Version).
View attachment 14797
Any more F7p Sqdn left after this replacement??PAF's No.18 Squadron “Sharp Shooters” which currently operates FT-7P will be replaced by JF-17B Thunder "Bravo" (Dual-Seat Version).
View attachment 14797
No 18 kahan hoti hai ?PAF's No.18 Squadron “Sharp Shooters” which currently operates FT-7P will be replaced by JF-17B Thunder "Bravo" (Dual-Seat Version).
View attachment 14797
As LIFT?PAF's No.18 Squadron “Sharp Shooters” which currently operates FT-7P will be replaced by JF-17B Thunder "Bravo" (Dual-Seat Version).
View attachment 14797
Mianwali OCUNo 18 kahan hoti hai ?
@Gripen9Is it true that AESA radar requires more power than PESA radar and cant perform properly if not enough power is supplied to it because of low engine power and will it be the case for JF-17 Block 1s and 2s ? that they (AESA )wont be able to perform as good as they will perform in Block 3 because of more powerful engine in Block 3 ? I read someones comment that main reason thrust is being increased in RD-93 MA is because RD-93 doesnt have enough power to fully utilize the capabilities of AESA
Very well explained but what about Block 1 and 2 , will these blocks have dual cooling methods too in the future or they will require some other form of modifications to be able to provide useful ranges for sustained periodsDepends on:
1. Efficiency of T/R modules
2. Cooling system
Modern GaN AESAs require less power for equal / greater capability than older GAA or PESA radars. However, because they can operate at much more powerful levels, they obviously will consume more power.
The big challenge is the cooling system. Traditional AESA radars are cooled using compressor technology. This is how AESA in the F-22 and F-35 are cooled. I don't know how it's cooled in the Rafale, but probably the same.
Because this kind of cooling requires a lot of power, and if you want massive useful ranges for sustained periods, you need more cooling (meaning more power), this can be a problem for older fighters that do not have a lot of power capacity.
Another option is to attempt to use alternative cooling methods. This can be air cooling (using a stream of air to cool the T/R modules) or by using solid state cooling.
Both have their limits though and are not as capable as traditional cooling methods. Solid state cooling has limited capability, beyond which they are inefficient.
I believe the JFTB3 has a dual cooling method, using both air cooling and traditional cooling method.
PS: I built myself a prototype air cooler using solid state peltier circuits. Basically, you can build a mini A/c fridge with it and have an "a/c" for maybe 5000 RS.
This only someone who actually works on these platforms can tell you. All other pseudo-experts are BSing if they claim to know this.Very well explained but what about Block 1 and 2 , will these blocks have dual cooling methods too in the future or they will require some other form of modifications to be able to provide useful ranges for sustained periods
@Khafee according to sami ibrahim vlog first blk3 expected in August
So next few months are excitingInShaAllah
Ye kon hai.@Khafee according to sami ibrahim vlog first blk3 expected in August
He states Mach 2InShaAllah