US Presidential Elections 2020 - News & Updates | Page 7 | World Defense

US Presidential Elections 2020 - News & Updates

space cadet

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Sep 2, 2019
Messages
1,338
Reactions
773 15 0
Country
USA
Location
USA
Cuomo looks good on TV, no matter what a giant screw up he is, the media likes him, may not hurt him that his brother is a CNN anchor. Chicago has a long history of Corruption, worse than New York or Jersey, goes back to before prohibition. And I will post some links to stories violence in Chicago.



the stories of shootings can be listed like a phone book for Chicago, the crazy thing is that this stuff doesn't get hardly any coverage in the media, "100 shot in one weekend"? This is huge news in any other city


and lets not forget about NYC

 
Last edited:

Jaeger

Professional
Joined
Oct 15, 2015
Messages
946
Reactions
1,628 13 0
Country
Germany
Location
USA
Cuomo looks good on TV, no matter what a giant screw up he is, the media likes him, may not hurt him that his brother is a CNN anchor. Chicago has a long history of Corruption, worse than New York or Jersey, goes back to before prohibition. And I will post some links to stories violence in Chicago.



the stories of shootings can be listed like a phone book for Chicago, the crazy thing is that this stuff doesn't get hardly any coverage in the media, "100 shot in one weekend"? This is huge news in any other city


and lets not forget about NYC

Finally, not to say my Chicago doesn't have crime/shootings, but no one hardly ever mentions NYC, LA, Houston's crime rates and they all increasing.
when I lived in Houston, I hated how easy people fell for Acevedo's 2 faced bs. for example he would say our officers keep our city safe, we need to support them, while at the same time comparing them to the Nazi Gestapo, and then just recently saying he needs more officers to the streets (Houston needs far more then what they currently have) but only wants 400 additional officers to solve this problem, when again the city layoffs at least ~100 officers at time,
Acevedo, also confiscates weapons from felons which then gives to single to protect them from violent offenders (Women Against Violence Act) but at the same also promotes gun-control/ban. it's so funny how people get manipulated by mainstream politics instead of researching
 

Yıldırım

MEMBER
Joined
Aug 28, 2016
Messages
502
Reactions
823 2 0
Country
Turkey
Location
Azerbaijan
does Chicago have any particular reasonings why there is so much corruption or is it just basic elections/politicians?
 

space cadet

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Sep 2, 2019
Messages
1,338
Reactions
773 15 0
Country
USA
Location
USA
does Chicago have any particular reasonings why there is so much corruption or is it just basic elections/politicians?
it's completely Democrat, you never want that, it will always turn into a mess. But in Chicago its I think just ingrained, part of life, those that came before were corrupt the next one chosen (and yes they are chosen) is corrupt also. You have similar type situation in New Orleans, its just always been that way, part of life, like the no show job.

Just in case you didn't know what he no show job was, relatives of the politician get jobs on boards or whatever, no experience necessary because they don't even show up to the job, they just collect a check, it's how payoffs get made. Look at Joe Biden's son's work in the oil and gas industry in foreign countries, or investment firms and where the money comes from.

Don't know if it's true or not but there were a lot of rumors about Michele Obama having" no show "jobs in Chicago. It was said that she got them just as soon as Barrack made it to the state senate, suddenly she has high paying jobs created for her
 
Last edited:

Jaeger

Professional
Joined
Oct 15, 2015
Messages
946
Reactions
1,628 13 0
Country
Germany
Location
USA
does Chicago have any particular reasonings why there is so much corruption or is it just basic elections/politicians?
for starters, it is your basic politicians and elections, many Chicagoans believer either Liberalism or Conservatism (depending on the person's stance) will fix this hot button issue, problem is neither will work, it's a root and it's deeply rooted. Democrats have won election after election for decades here.

However Lightfoot, even though she can be ignorant at times, has done a lot more to help quell the gun violence/gangs that main media (such as CNN or Fox) won't even shed a single tidbit of light on. She has created the "Outreach Street" program which helps organizations with de-escalate and high crisis intervention networks across West and South Chicago to help high risk individuals find a way out, and this year she is expanding it and guess what, last year Chicago had 500 homicides, and not only did she do that, she also expanded the READI Program which helps high risk individuals or people who quit gangs/got out of prison, by helping educate, finding them jobs and supporting them. Lightfoot's expansion of the READI program helped 500 people find jobs and get out of gangs, this year 600 people have entered and found jobs so far, (1,100 people found jobs) between 2019-2020. last year she launched the "Ground for Peace" project which converted 50 vacant lots in North Lawndale, Woodlawn and Englewood which will train 50 people on maintenance and landscaping. Lightfoot also has a Youth at Risk Program, (Kids at risk of being a victim to violence and or at risk of joining a gang), it's a program that is 6 weeks long in the late summer which teaches them life-skills, as a paid job and 4 hours of individual mentoring, last year 400 kids participated and bettered themselves, this year was 2,000. see what I mean? Lightfoot has done a good job (whether you stand Republican or Democrat) at helping her violent-stricken communities.

when the 2020 Riots happened here in Chicago, the tension with the Police and Community were very high at the time. so to help ease the tensions, Lightfoot and the Superintendent of Police, David Brown, formed the Community Safety Team which goes all around Chicago to learn the community members they are serving and protecting. They also formed the new District Coordination Officer, which is where individuals can call their DCOs rather directly calling 9-1-1 (but it has to be like cases like the neighbor is loud, and other non-emergency calls). CPD also launched the Community-Immersion Program which is a 90 day training project for Probationary Police Officers which not only teaches them basic policing skills, but enhancing their community engagement skills..

Lightfoot also just launched the INVEST South/West parts of Chicago, which is to refurbish and "uplift" retail stores in Englewood, Gresham, and Austin areas in phase one. this also include a "new town center", a mix used building as well fixing up and refurbishing abandoned buildings so newer businesses can be created . 10-12 communities will be renovated and be bringing in revenue for their communities (as well as the city of course). is this project perfect? of course not, and most likely plagued with corruption from various alderman behind closed doors, but again even so it's just the idea/fact it can cut the crime rates down even more, if even by a small %. This is a 3 year project, so we will need to wait and see.

the most recent and closest case of corruption for Chicago is the new Tribune Tower East, which was to be started in 2019, when the discussion with the city and company first started negotiating in 2016. however the city wanted the LA based firm to pay $13 Million into the Lightfoot's new "Affordable Housing project" which includes at least ~11 apartments to be used by a person who is only making 60% or less of the area's median income (downtown).

so see what I mean, I put 2 positives in that Chicago has done without a tidbit of corruption, while adding 2 that I guess can be considered "corrupted" to an extent.

fast tracking off Chicago, Houston is becoming really corrupt and at a faster rate ever since Hurricane Harvey hit land in 2017. Mayor Turner, received state funds to give to families so they can rebuild or refurbish their homes, guess what only close to ~1,000 families received any money while the rest went to the city's pocket. Turner hired an intern, who is getting paid ~$95,000 a year (with no educational skills aka no college certificate) which raised everyone's eyebrows. not only that, Turner is now trying to absorb/annex Bellaire, Woodlands, West University (those are "different" townships) because they have higher property taxes. he also promised several flood prevention projects to the city, yet only 1 small dredge/flood release zone was built, where did the rest of that money go? the new Texas Tower was to be built in 2018 and be finished towards the end of this year, guess what now won't be done tell 2024, you know why? because the company probably didn't give him enough bribery money..

you can have corruption anywhere, it's not only Chicago.
 

space cadet

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Sep 2, 2019
Messages
1,338
Reactions
773 15 0
Country
USA
Location
USA
for starters, it is your basic politicians and elections, many Chicagoans believer either Liberalism or Conservatism (depending on the person's stance) will fix this hot button issue, problem is neither will work, it's a root and it's deeply rooted. Democrats have won election after election for decades here.

However Lightfoot, even though she can be ignorant at times, has done a lot more to help quell the gun violence/gangs that main media (such as CNN or Fox) won't even shed a single tidbit of light on. She has created the "Outreach Street" program which helps organizations with de-escalate and high crisis intervention networks across West and South Chicago to help high risk individuals find a way out, and this year she is expanding it and guess what, last year Chicago had 500 homicides, and not only did she do that, she also expanded the READI Program which helps high risk individuals or people who quit gangs/got out of prison, by helping educate, finding them jobs and supporting them. Lightfoot's expansion of the READI program helped 500 people find jobs and get out of gangs, this year 600 people have entered and found jobs so far, (1,100 people found jobs) between 2019-2020. last year she launched the "Ground for Peace" project which converted 50 vacant lots in North Lawndale, Woodlawn and Englewood which will train 50 people on maintenance and landscaping. Lightfoot also has a Youth at Risk Program, (Kids at risk of being a victim to violence and or at risk of joining a gang), it's a program that is 6 weeks long in the late summer which teaches them life-skills, as a paid job and 4 hours of individual mentoring, last year 400 kids participated and bettered themselves, this year was 2,000. see what I mean? Lightfoot has done a good job (whether you stand Republican or Democrat) at helping her violent-stricken communities.

when the 2020 Riots happened here in Chicago, the tension with the Police and Community were very high at the time. so to help ease the tensions, Lightfoot and the Superintendent of Police, David Brown, formed the Community Safety Team which goes all around Chicago to learn the community members they are serving and protecting. They also formed the new District Coordination Officer, which is where individuals can call their DCOs rather directly calling 9-1-1 (but it has to be like cases like the neighbor is loud, and other non-emergency calls). CPD also launched the Community-Immersion Program which is a 90 day training project for Probationary Police Officers which not only teaches them basic policing skills, but enhancing their community engagement skills..

Lightfoot also just launched the INVEST South/West parts of Chicago, which is to refurbish and "uplift" retail stores in Englewood, Gresham, and Austin areas in phase one. this also include a "new town center", a mix used building as well fixing up and refurbishing abandoned buildings so newer businesses can be created . 10-12 communities will be renovated and be bringing in revenue for their communities (as well as the city of course). is this project perfect? of course not, and most likely plagued with corruption from various alderman behind closed doors, but again even so it's just the idea/fact it can cut the crime rates down even more, if even by a small %. This is a 3 year project, so we will need to wait and see.

the most recent and closest case of corruption for Chicago is the new Tribune Tower East, which was to be started in 2019, when the discussion with the city and company first started negotiating in 2016. however the city wanted the LA based firm to pay $13 Million into the Lightfoot's new "Affordable Housing project" which includes at least ~11 apartments to be used by a person who is only making 60% or less of the area's median income (downtown).

so see what I mean, I put 2 positives in that Chicago has done without a tidbit of corruption, while adding 2 that I guess can be considered "corrupted" to an extent.

fast tracking off Chicago, Houston is becoming really corrupt and at a faster rate ever since Hurricane Harvey hit land in 2017. Mayor Turner, received state funds to give to families so they can rebuild or refurbish their homes, guess what only close to ~1,000 families received any money while the rest went to the city's pocket. Turner hired an intern, who is getting paid ~$95,000 a year (with no educational skills aka no college certificate) which raised everyone's eyebrows. not only that, Turner is now trying to absorb/annex Bellaire, Woodlands, West University (those are "different" townships) because they have higher property taxes. he also promised several flood prevention projects to the city, yet only 1 small dredge/flood release zone was built, where did the rest of that money go? the new Texas Tower was to be built in 2018 and be finished towards the end of this year, guess what now won't be done tell 2024, you know why? because the company probably didn't give him enough bribery money..

you can have corruption anywhere, it's not only Chicago.
I was just reading a story the other day, it was interviews with Chicagoans that were fleeing, there might not be enough tax base after they let all the rioting and looting go on, people have had enough.
 

Jaeger

Professional
Joined
Oct 15, 2015
Messages
946
Reactions
1,628 13 0
Country
Germany
Location
USA
I was just reading a story the other day, it was interviews with Chicagoans that were fleeing, there might not be enough tax base after they let all the rioting and looting go on, people have had enough.
funny thing, people over react when people leave. sure we had some leave, however most just went to suburbs lol. it's not really that big of deal, as the city is also working to absorb suburbs.

cities I'm waiting to see loose huge swarms of people is New York, Seattle, Los Angeles, Portland
 

space cadet

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Sep 2, 2019
Messages
1,338
Reactions
773 15 0
Country
USA
Location
USA
funny thing, people over react when people leave. sure we had some leave, however most just went to suburbs lol. it's not really that big of deal, as the city is also working to absorb suburbs.

cities I'm waiting to see loose huge swarms of people is New York, Seattle, Los Angeles, Portland
Oh they are, New York especially. A lot of businesses are leaving NYC, and I imagine it will be the same in all these places, I keep waiting for the insurance companies to start refusing to insure businesses where cities allowed looting and rioting to go on.
 

Scorpion

THINK TANK: SENIOR
Joined
Nov 27, 2014
Messages
3,868
Reactions
3,197 56 0
Country
Saudi Arabia
Location
Saudi Arabia
Joe is not going to make it to office. The other part of the house should focus on 2024 election by training new sane candidates.
 

space cadet

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Sep 2, 2019
Messages
1,338
Reactions
773 15 0
Country
USA
Location
USA
Joe is not going to make it to office. The other part of the house should focus on 2024 election by training new sane candidates.
Biden will make it, they will carry him, he can't even read a teleprompter but they got him this far, as for training new sane candidates, that would be impossible without sane people which their party lacks as the few who were left got run out of the Democrat party by the communists
 

Jaeger

Professional
Joined
Oct 15, 2015
Messages
946
Reactions
1,628 13 0
Country
Germany
Location
USA
problem with a lot democrats now, is a lot is going towards more radical leftism (aka Socialist Democracy) or whatever they call it. originally it was people like Bernie Sanders, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib and so on, now it's most everyone and a lot of Trump Supporters mix people who are leftist/liberal with "Socialist Democrats", which I can tell you irritates them more with a passion, because there is a lot of leftist/Liberals who don't back the idea of democratic socialists.
Biden, he may have dementia, but Harris is what's going to make him look good for the presidency/his current campaign, not himself, and tbh I'm kind of surprised not enough have caught on, and with Harris she's going to be a problem if they win. why is that? easy she is very excessive on imprisoning people for minor offences all across San Francisco, and she is very pro-Abortion (a lot of people are turning against Abortions due to the fact a lot of feministic women use it because they don't want responsibility for the child)

I'm not a "die hard" Trump Supporter, but I chose him from the lesser of two evils. Trump has had good acts such as the "Save Our Seas" Act, brought back over countless jobs from China, had a far stronger stance against China and so on. the vibe that kills it for me usually are his twitter wars, and his diehard he can't do nothing wrong supporters.

there is a 3rd candidate, Jo Jorgensen, but I've heard she is pretty radical herself and more or less aligns herself with democrats in a roundabout way unofficially, she just claims she is "different" by being Libertarian
 

space cadet

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Sep 2, 2019
Messages
1,338
Reactions
773 15 0
Country
USA
Location
USA
problem with a lot democrats now, is a lot is going towards more radical leftism (aka Socialist Democracy) or whatever they call it. originally it was people like Bernie Sanders, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib and so on, now it's most everyone and a lot of Trump Supporters mix people who are leftist/liberal with "Socialist Democrats", which I can tell you irritates them more with a passion, because there is a lot of leftist/Liberals who don't back the idea of democratic socialists.
Biden, he may have dementia, but Harris is what's going to make him look good for the presidency/his current campaign, not himself, and tbh I'm kind of surprised not enough have caught on, and with Harris she's going to be a problem if they win. why is that? easy she is very excessive on imprisoning people for minor offences all across San Francisco, and she is very pro-Abortion (a lot of people are turning against Abortions due to the fact a lot of feministic women use it because they don't want responsibility for the child)

I'm not a "die hard" Trump Supporter, but I chose him from the lesser of two evils. Trump has had good acts such as the "Save Our Seas" Act, brought back over countless jobs from China, had a far stronger stance against China and so on. the vibe that kills it for me usually are his twitter wars, and his diehard he can't do nothing wrong supporters.

there is a 3rd candidate, Jo Jorgensen, but I've heard she is pretty radical herself and more or less aligns herself with democrats in a roundabout way unofficially, she just claims she is "different" by being Libertarian
I have heard Democrats, (or former Democrats) who said they got pushed out because they wouldn't toe the "new line". These socialists, or as Bloomberg called them, (and I do also) communists have a "Your with us 100%, or your against us" attitude, there is no compromise to them, and it's shocking that a lot of Democrats don't know what they are voting for. As for Harris, I agree she will be a problem, I don't think its because of her abortion stance or jailing people, she isn't going to jail anyone, hell she is bailing rioters out of jail, she will do whatever she has to to please the mob, and that is the exact opposite of what needs to be done
 

space cadet

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Sep 2, 2019
Messages
1,338
Reactions
773 15 0
Country
USA
Location
USA

The Biden-Sanders Manifesto​

Voters should examine how far left the former vice president has moved since winning the primaries.​


1599573853964.png

When unemployment and poverty rates hit record lows in late 2019, while retirement accounts and average household incomes surged to record highs, Joe Biden understood that general-election voters would never go for Bernie Sanders’s tax-and-spend socialism or Elizabeth Warren’s command-and-control version. Mr. Biden also bet, taking longer odds, that the Democratic establishment and ultimately the Democratic primary voter, desperately wanting to retake power, would reject his primary rivals as well. So Mr. Biden offered a nicer version of the status quo. “Nobody has to be punished,” he told donors in June 2019. “No one’s standard of living will change, nothing would fundamentally change.”

Despite Mr. Biden’s shaky start, he surged in South Carolina once Democrats faced the reality that the alternative was Mr. Sanders, a self-identified socialist who was on record saying positive things about Venezuela, Cuba and the Soviet Union. The establishment swung behind Mr. Biden and the primaries were over.

Yet after he won the nomination as the only “moderate” in the race, the new world of the coronavirus shutdown revealed a new candidate who wants “not just to rebuild the economy, but to transform it,” as Mr. Biden said in a May address. In rapid succession he adopted the Sanders platform, the cornerstone of the Warren candidacy, and the most radical racial agenda in recent U.S. history.

Mr. Biden’s dramatic political transformation has exposed what many have always suspected: Moderate Democrats aren’t socialists unless they think they can adopt socialist policies and survive politically.

The Biden-Sanders “Unity” manifesto envisions the socialism of an all-encompassing welfare state, with virtually every need a right, and every right guaranteed by taxpayer funding. Housing becomes a right, and “no one should have to pay more than 30 percent of
their income for housing.” Public colleges will be “tuition-free” for “roughly 80 percent of the American people.” Student loans are expunged, payments are capped and eventually forgiven. School lunches, along with breakfast and supper, will be universally free.

On health care, Mr. Biden bought Mr. Sanders’s “Medicare for All” scheme—though on an installment plan. First health care becomes a right where “no one pays more than 8.5 percent of their income.” Mr. Biden’s planned public option is heavily subsidized, with no deductibles and low copayments. Like current Medicare, this “Medicare option” would further inflate the cost of private plans by making them pay more to compensate for government’s underpayment to hospitals and doctors. The inevitable result would be that the Medicare option would quickly “compete” private plans out of business. Commercial banking would be similarly threatened by new publicly backed post-office banks along with the Federal Reserve, which Mr. Biden wants to grant permanent authority to lend to businesses.

A President Biden would implement a version of the Sanders Green New Deal, only in 15 years instead of 10. Mr. Biden’s plan uses mandates and subsidies to dictate what kind of energy is produced, remaking the world’s most efficient energy industry in the image of Solyndra.

In all things, the government would direct, regulate and mandate with armies of the “best and brightest,” organized as a caring corps of subsidized health-, child- and elder-care workers, plus a climate corps of environmental regulators. Government employees would enjoy the “highest labor standards” for pay and benefits. A new right to strike for all workers would include secondary strikes like those that recently paralyzed France.

With government for, of and by government, all public servants would benefit, except the police. Police are to be more closely tracked and exposed, and federal law-enforcement would be hampered with a New York-style arrest-and-release program. Disorder awaits. Since Mr. Biden believes “substance use disorders are diseases, not crimes” and “no one should be in prison solely because they use drugs,” American neighborhoods may soon resemble the streets of San Francisco.

After picking up Mr. Sanders’s positions, Mr. Biden has absorbed Ms. Warren’s rhetoric. This month he pledged to end the “era of shareholder capitalism.” That era began with the Great Economic Awakening that followed the Enlightenment. By rejecting shareholder capitalism and making private wealth subject to public demands, the Biden administration would take America back to the medieval world, where labor and capital were forced to pay fealty to the crown, guild, church and village, which leeched the lifeblood out of the incentives to work and save. Today’s critics of shareholder capitalism want to hand business over to “stakeholders” such as government, environmentalists, unions and communities.

As the new stakeholders extract their unearned share, the equity value of businesses would plummet. Since 70% of all U.S. stocks are owned by 401(k)s, individual retirement accounts, private retirement plans or insurance companies to fund annuities and death benefits, Americans would see their nest eggs shattered. Resources would be redistributed not by taxing and spending but simply by forcing private companies and their employees to share the fruits of their labor and thrift. Unlike Mr. Sanders’s socialism, in which government assumes control and therefore the blame when the system fails, Ms. Warren’s style of socialism means it’s always possible to blame business.

The final pillar of the Biden program is racial justice. Ironically, the vice president to the first black president believes that America is systemically racist. His “Unity” program declares that virtually every significant gap—in wealth, health care, housing, policing, education—can be blamed on racism. The cure is a massive transformation of every aspect of American life, using a reparations commission, wealth transfers, subsidies, employment and promotion preferences, quotas, and even a new mandate to the Federal Reserve to seek racial equity. Every action that displaces merit with preference will reduce American efficiency and competitiveness. Tilting the system in the name of correcting old injustices will create new ones.

Four months into the pandemic crisis, with the nation’s cities ablaze, the moderate Mr. Biden seemed likely to run away with the election. But moved by a dual crisis too big to waste, and pushed by the base of his party, he has now adopted Sanders-Warren socialism and a radical plan to remake American society on the basis of race.

Before Mr. Biden’s transformation, the question facing voters was “Do you support Donald Trump?” The question now is, “Are you willing to endanger the economy and your freedom to end the Trump presidency?” For discontented Republicans and independents, and the many Americans who found refuge from socialism in this country, those questions are very different. There is a big difference between being unhappy and being suicidal.
 
Top