This is PDF
I meant their Intel is copied from other sources.
This is PDF
Yes true, but now they started slowly accepting the info, prioir to that every making fun of this infoI meant their Intel is copied from other sources.
Pakistan already had many wars with India in past, including the on going WoT with Indian made TTP. So this ''one time peace offer'' makes no sense.We have shown our restraint and desire for peace one time, next time we'll make them peaceful.
Pakistan already had many wars with India in past, including the on going WoT on Indian made TTP. So this ''one time peace offer'' makes no sense.
If Pakistan intend to make them peaceful next time, than what was so wrong in doing same, when they were totally confused and in disarray.
For sure, on 27th February, InAF could have been neutralized with minimum casualties from both sides, specially Pakistani side.
Now question is if India going to give Pakistan an opportunity like 2019!
I doubt they are so stupid, so there's no point in making hypothetical assumptions for some thing which is not going to happen any time soon.
Going back to the one time peace, nation deserves to know the name of decision maker, who have hell of explanation to make. Specially in regard to how he came to the calculation, on drawing lines for PAF.
Pakistan could have pressed a ahead and knock out all Indian aircraft out of sky on 27th February. without loosing single aircraft.
Sometimes you may win all the battles yet lose the war. From a strategic pov, swift retort achieved its purpose without derailing economy and a full scale war.Pakistan could have pressed a ahead and knock out all Indian aircraft out of sky on 27th February. without loosing single aircraft.
Still i mentioned minimum causalities, which again is relative term.
Sometimes you may win all the battles yet lose the war. From a strategic pov, swift retort achieved its purpose without derailing economy and a full scale war.
A soldier fights to win a battle, a commander plans to win the war.
What could be more retard by ordering PAF to stand down, once they had jammed Indian radars and comm. and thinking Indians would become friendly nation!and definitely not for retards.
What could be more retard by ordering PAF to stand down, once they had jammed Indian radars and comm. and thinking Indians would become friendly nation!
Pakistan already had many wars with India in past, including the on going WoT on Indian made TTP. So this ''one time peace offer'' makes no sense.
If Pakistan intend to make them peaceful next time, than what was so wrong in doing same, when they were totally confused and in disarray.
For sure, on 27th February, InAF could have been neutralized with minimum casualties from both sides, specially Pakistani side.
Now question is if India going to give Pakistan an opportunity like 2019!
I doubt they are so stupid, so there's no point in making hypothetical assumptions for some thing which is not going to happen any time soon.
Going back to the one time peace, nation deserves to know the name of decision maker, who have hell of explanation to make. Specially in regard to how he came to the calculation, on drawing lines for PAF.
I asked you before, pls do a little bit of research, before you ask such questions.On a purely speculative basis what might be the "pakistan" specific features of the incoming j-10P.Can integration with Link16 be possible along with the already present Link17
Im just asking people to speculate what might be seen.I see see your post which said that this cannot be found on the web,therefore i added the speculation part.I asked you before, pls do a little bit of research, before you ask such questions.
Im just asking people to speculate what might be seen.I see see your post which said that this cannot be found on the web,therefore i added the speculation part.